DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Is delaying notification for law enforcement purposes ever unreasonable?

Posted on April 5, 2014 by Dissent

Over on Security Bistro, Linda Musthaler discusses the recently disclosed Spec’s breach and the fact that Spec’s knew about the breach but was asked not to disclose it by law enforcement.

We’ve seen this many times – delays in notification so as not to interfere with a law enforcement investigation. But should there be some limits on how long notification can be delayed or should it be open-ended at law enforcement’s request, keeping in mind that law enforcement can only request, it seems, but not order the entity not to disclose?

In terms of a balancing act, if the data involved are “just” credit or debit cards, it’s relatively easy to restore individual’s accounts and issue new account numbers, and it should be relatively easy (although often isn’t) to get credit reports corrected and restored. So even though it’s inconvenient for customers who may be without their cards for a while and who may have to re-do any accounts on automatic payment and spend time correcting credit reports, consumers can be restored and compensated.

But what about if the data being stolen or compromised include SSN or medical information? Should the criminal activity be allowed to run for another year or so while law enforcement investigates and people’s sensitive information or SSN may wind up in the hands of others?  If people become identity theft victims or medical identity theft victims (and not just card fraud or new account fraud victims), it’s a lot harder to fix things. We’ve seen cases where people are arrested erroneously as a result of ID theft. We know that medical identity theft can lead to treatment errors and potentially serious medical care and/or insurance problems. What about those risks? Does law enforcement’s understandable needs outweigh what happens as more people become victims because no one notified them in a timely fashion?

Do we need to draw a line on nondisclosure for law enforcement purposes or not?

You can read Musthaler’s commentary on SecurityBistro.

No related posts.

Category: Business SectorCommentaries and AnalysesHackID TheftMalwareU.S.

Post navigation

← FL: Call center employee and 7 others charged in ID theft fraud scheme involving AT&T customer info
IL: New teacher licensing system full of glitches, hitches →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ransomware in Italy, strike at the Diskstation gang: hacker group leader arrested in Milan
  • A year after cyber attack, Columbus could invest $23M in cybersecurity upgrades
  • Gravity Forms Breach Hits 1M WordPress Sites
  • Stormous claims to have protected health info on 600,000 patients of North Country Healthcare. The data appear fake. (1)
  • Back from the Brink: District Court Clears Air Regarding Individualized Damages Assessment in Data Breach Cases
  • Multiple lawsuits filed against Doyon Ltd over April 2024 data breach and late notification
  • Chinese hackers suspected in breach of powerful DC law firm
  • Qilin Emerged as The Most Active Group, Exploiting Unpatched Fortinet Vulnerabilities
  • CISA tags Citrix Bleed 2 as exploited, gives agencies a day to patch
  • McDonald’s McHire leak involving ‘123456’ admin password exposes 64 million applicant chat records

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Here’s What a Reproductive Police State Looks Like
  • Meta investors, Zuckerberg to square off at $8 billion trial over alleged privacy violations
  • Australian law is now clearer about clinicians’ discretion to tell our patients’ relatives about their genetic risk
  • The ICO’s AI and biometrics strategy
  • Trump Border Czar Boasts ICE Can ‘Briefly Detain’ People Based On ‘Physical Appearance’
  • DeleteMyInfo Wins 2025 Digital Privacy Excellence Award from Internet Safety Council
  • TikTok Loses First Appeal Against £12.7M ICO Fine, Faces Second Investigation by DPC

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.