DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Charles Schwab Accuses Ex-Employee of Stealing Confidential Info

Posted on July 3, 2014 by Dissent

Law360 reports that Charles Schwab & Co. has sued a former employee, alleging he violated his contract with the company by stealing confidential client information and trade secrets to help launch his own rival company. Read more on Law360.com (subscription required).

Category: Financial SectorInsiderTheftU.S.

Post navigation

← DK: 900,000 residents’ social security numbers leaked (updated)
BBC’s Panorama team loses confidential information relating to a secret British Army unit →

4 thoughts on “Charles Schwab Accuses Ex-Employee of Stealing Confidential Info”

  1. Regret says:
    July 3, 2014 at 1:11 pm

    Info on the case can be found here (if my link works). This suit is an example of a once common anti-competitive tactic of major brokerage firms, although Charles Schwab had not pursued departing advisors as aggressively as traditional wirehouses (e.g., Merrill Lynch, Smith Barney) in the past. To help mitigate the costs of pursuing these lawsuits many industry participants have agreed to a protocol that outlines permissible actions for departing brokers (see http://www.thebrokerprotocol.com/read-the-broker-protocol), which also may protect clients’ privacy and right to choose their own adviser. It doesn’t appear that Schwab is a current protocol participant, but even so, courts have found that this protocol can even be applied to non-participants and has thrown out lawsuits because of the protocol’s existence. I also know, from personal experience, that the accusation in lawsuits of this type are not necessarily factual, as the plaintiff throws a lot of stuff into the suit in order to convince a judge to issue a temporary restraining order against the offending broker. In other words, Mr. Castro, the ex-employee, may not have “stolen” any confidential information and may only be contacting former clients to see if they would be willing to continue working with them at his/her new firm. If Mr. Castro did violate the terms of the protocol, it will be interesting to see how new privacy laws will be applied in this situation.

    1. Dissent says:
      July 3, 2014 at 3:15 pm

      Thanks for posting a link to more info.

  2. Jeanne Price says:
    July 3, 2014 at 5:53 pm

    I’ve spoken to Clinton Marrs who is the attorney for Christoper Canorro, the named defendant in the Schwab case. He stated that Canorro took no information with him since Schwab does not participate in the broker protocol agreement that lets employees access their client data at new firms. Instead, he said this was an intimidation tactic to keep financial consultants from leaving the firm. I guess a court will decide if any data breach existed or can be confirmed.

    1. Dissent says:
      July 3, 2014 at 6:11 pm

      Thanks for staying on and digging into all these breaches, Jeanne – and for sharing what you find here.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Central Maine Healthcare tackles suspected cybersecurity issue; hospitals remain open
  • Cartier Data Breach: Luxury Retailer Warns Customers that Personal Data Was Exposed
  • Beyond the Pond Phish: Unraveling Lazarus Group’s Evolving Tactics
  • Akira doesn’t keep its promises to victims — SuspectFile
  • Fraudsters, murderers, students: who the GRU assembled a team of hacker provocateurs from and why it failed
  • Order of Psychologists of Lombardy fined 30,000 € for inadequate data security protection and detection following ransomware attack
  • Lower Merion School District says a data breach was caused by a computer glitch (1)
  • After $1 Million Ransom Demand, Virgin Islands Lottery Restores Operations Without Paying Hackers
  • Junior Defence Contractor Arrested For Leaking Indian Naval Secrets To Suspected Pakistani Spies
  • Mysterious leaker GangExposed outs Conti kingpins in massive ransomware data dump

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Stewart Baker vs. Orin Kerr on “The Digital Fourth Amendment”
  • Fears Grow Over ICE’s Reach Into Schools
  • Resource: HoganLovells Asia-Pacific Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Guide 2025
  • She Got an Abortion. So A Texas Cop Used 83,000 Cameras to Track Her Down.
  • Why AI May Be Listening In on Your Next Doctor’s Appointment
  • Watch out for activist judges trying to deprive us of our rights to safe reproductive healthcare
  • Nebraska Bans Minor Social Media Accounts Without Parental Consent

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.