DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Charles Schwab Accuses Ex-Employee of Stealing Confidential Info

Posted on July 3, 2014 by Dissent

Law360 reports that Charles Schwab & Co. has sued a former employee, alleging he violated his contract with the company by stealing confidential client information and trade secrets to help launch his own rival company. Read more on Law360.com (subscription required).

Category: Financial SectorInsiderTheftU.S.

Post navigation

← DK: 900,000 residents’ social security numbers leaked (updated)
BBC’s Panorama team loses confidential information relating to a secret British Army unit →

4 thoughts on “Charles Schwab Accuses Ex-Employee of Stealing Confidential Info”

  1. Regret says:
    July 3, 2014 at 1:11 pm

    Info on the case can be found here (if my link works). This suit is an example of a once common anti-competitive tactic of major brokerage firms, although Charles Schwab had not pursued departing advisors as aggressively as traditional wirehouses (e.g., Merrill Lynch, Smith Barney) in the past. To help mitigate the costs of pursuing these lawsuits many industry participants have agreed to a protocol that outlines permissible actions for departing brokers (see http://www.thebrokerprotocol.com/read-the-broker-protocol), which also may protect clients’ privacy and right to choose their own adviser. It doesn’t appear that Schwab is a current protocol participant, but even so, courts have found that this protocol can even be applied to non-participants and has thrown out lawsuits because of the protocol’s existence. I also know, from personal experience, that the accusation in lawsuits of this type are not necessarily factual, as the plaintiff throws a lot of stuff into the suit in order to convince a judge to issue a temporary restraining order against the offending broker. In other words, Mr. Castro, the ex-employee, may not have “stolen” any confidential information and may only be contacting former clients to see if they would be willing to continue working with them at his/her new firm. If Mr. Castro did violate the terms of the protocol, it will be interesting to see how new privacy laws will be applied in this situation.

    1. Dissent says:
      July 3, 2014 at 3:15 pm

      Thanks for posting a link to more info.

  2. Jeanne Price says:
    July 3, 2014 at 5:53 pm

    I’ve spoken to Clinton Marrs who is the attorney for Christoper Canorro, the named defendant in the Schwab case. He stated that Canorro took no information with him since Schwab does not participate in the broker protocol agreement that lets employees access their client data at new firms. Instead, he said this was an intimidation tactic to keep financial consultants from leaving the firm. I guess a court will decide if any data breach existed or can be confirmed.

    1. Dissent says:
      July 3, 2014 at 6:11 pm

      Thanks for staying on and digging into all these breaches, Jeanne – and for sharing what you find here.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Why Dumping Sensitive Data on Network Shares is a Liability
  • A militarily degraded Iran may turn to asymmetrical warfare – raising risk of proxy and cyber attacks
  • Pro-Russian hackers disrupt Dutch government websites ahead of NATO summit
  • Iran-Linked Threat Actors Leak Visitors and Athletes’ Data from Saudi Games
  • UK: Oxford City Council still investigating cyberattack from earlier this month
  • Steelmaker Nucor Says Hackers Stole Data in Recent Attack
  • People’s Republic of China cyber threat activity: Cyber Threat Bulletin
  • Ukrainian Web3 security auditing company Hacken suffered an attack that allowed a hacker to create 900 million HAI tokens
  • McLaren provides written notice to 743,131 patients after ransomware attack in July 2024 (2)
  • A state forensics lab was leaking its files. Getting it locked down involved a number of people.

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Sky Views Personal Data as a Potential Weapon in IPTV Piracy War
  • Florida Used a Nationwide Surveillance Camera Network 250 Times To Aid in Immigration Arrests
  • Federal Court Strikes Down HIPAA Reproductive Health Care Privacy Rule
  • The Markup caught 4 more states sharing personal health data with Big Tech
  • Privacy in the Big Sky State: Montana’s Consumer Privacy Law Gets Amended
  • UK Passes Data Use and Access Regulation Bill
  • Officials defend Liberal bill that would force hospitals, banks, hotels to hand over data

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.