DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

The complaint to FTC about Experian that accomplished… what?

Posted on October 1, 2015 by Dissent

Today, Experian disclosed another data breach. This one affected 15 million customers of T-Mobile USA, for whom Experian hosts consumer data used for credit checks for new accounts.

In tweeting my frustration about this latest incident, @emptywheel suggested I post the complaint I filed with the FTC about Experian in 2012. After some thought, I’ve decided to do just that.

As background: in April 2012, this blogger filed a complaint with the FTC about two patterns of data breaches reported by Experian. One type of breach involved their clients’ login credentials being misused to access their credit report database(s). The other type of breach involved people being able to authenticate as consumers and access the credit reports for those consumers.

At the time I filed the complaint, I was aware of 72 data breaches reported by Experian to state attorneys general in the handful of states that had centralized breach reporting.  Of those 72 reported breaches, 62 involved misuse of client login credentials. Jordan Robertson of Bloomberg also subsequently reported on the breaches.

Since April 2012, I have continued to update the FTC by e-mail as more breaches have been reported (and cf, this post). As of my last update to the FTC, there were now reports by Experian of 109 data breaches where clients’ login credentials were misused, plus additional breaches where unknown individuals were able to authenticate as consumers to access their credit reports.

And that doesn’t include the Court Ventures mess, which also involved Experian.

So if you’re a T-Mobile USA customer who’s ticked off at Experian over this newest data breach, maybe you should join me in asking the FTC what, exactly, they’ve done with respect to Experian and enforcing data security to protect consumers. They certainly can’t claim they didn’t know and weren’t warned that there were concerns, because here’s the complaint (pdf) they received in April, 2012.


Related:

  • Resource: NY DFS Issues New Cybersecurity Guidance to Address Risks Associated with the Use of Third-Party Service Providers
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
  • Hotel and Casino near Las Vegas Strip suffers data breach, documents say
  • Bombay High Court Orders Department of Telecommunications to Block Medusa Accounts After Generali Insurance Data Breach
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
Category: Business SectorCommentaries and AnalysesHackOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← Experian’s servers hacked; 15 million T-Mobile USA customers affected (UPDATED)
American Bankers Association notifies 6,400 to reset passwords after hack and data dump →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.