DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

EPIC Defends Right of PayTime Data Breach Victims to Bring Suit

Posted on April 20, 2016 by Dissent

EPIC.org is joining those who believe that victims of the PayTime data breach should not have had their lawsuit dismissed for lack of standing. 

EPIC has filed an amicus  urging a federal appeals court to overturn a decision that limits the ability of data breach victims to sue. The plaintiffs sued a payroll company after their Social Security Numbers and other identifying information were exposed. A lower court dismissed the case because fraudulent transactions had not yet occurred. EPIC argued that data breach victims can sue without having to wait for specific damages. EPIC cataloged the epidemic of data breaches in the US, and explained why companies should be liable when they fail to protect the consumer data they collect. EPIC regularly files briefs defending consumer privacy.

Related posts:

  • White House Tells EPIC to Delete COVID-19 Records, EPIC Declines
  • Data Security Auditor May be Drawn Into Data Breach Class Action for Failing to Identify Vulnerabilities
  • EPIC to DC Circuit: Informational Privacy is a Constitutional Right
  • Standing should not stop data breach suit, civil liberties group says
Category: Business SectorHackU.S.

Post navigation

← AU: Gold Coast Health apologizes and retrains staff after patient notes found lying in street
SpyEye Makers Get 24 Years in Prison →

1 thought on “EPIC Defends Right of PayTime Data Breach Victims to Bring Suit”

  1. IA Eng says:
    April 21, 2016 at 7:50 am

    again, this is way too late in the game. The larger corporations have their way with consumers. There is no consumer protection that matters in this world. You’ll be hard pressed to find some investigative report that can absolutely without a doubt prove that a particular breach was the cause that ended with the PII being used and damages were incurred. You cannot throw out the possibility of “unknown” or “un-reported” breaches, undisclosed insider threats.

    It would be WAY more feasible for corporations to be given a mandatory flat fine for each ACTIVE record that was breached. The money is held in escrow for 5 years after the initial date of the breach. After 5 years, the funds are realeased back to the company and must be used in the realm of security and protection of consumer information and the upgrading of security related equipment at the facility where the PII is stored.

    The US government is clueless on how to control the bleeding behind all of these breaches. We need a government free of circus animals in charge and a president and appointed officials that truly give a crap about what is happening in the realm of these breaches. Sooner or later all this PII floating around can cause massive panic in an electronic war that will take decades to unscrew.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • CMS Sending Letters to 103,000 Medicare beneficiaries whose info was involved in a Medicare.gov breach.
  • Esse Health provides update about April cyberattack and notifies 263,601 people
  • Terrible tales of opsec oversights: How cybercrooks get themselves caught
  • International Criminal Court hit with cyber attack during NATO summit
  • Pembroke Regional Hospital reported canceling appointments due to service delays from “an incident”
  • Iran-linked hackers threaten to release emails allegedly stolen from Trump associates
  • National Health Care Fraud Takedown Results in 324 Defendants Charged in Connection with Over $14.6 Billion in Alleged Fraud
  • Swiss Health Foundation Radix Hit by Cyberattack Affecting Federal Data
  • Russian hackers get 7 and 5 years in prison for large-scale cyber attacks with ransomware, over 60 million euros in bitcoins seized
  • Bolton Walk-In Clinic patient data leak locked down (finally!)

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Trump administration is building a national citizenship data system
  • Supreme Court Decision on Age Verification Tramples Free Speech and Undermines Privacy
  • New Jersey Issues Draft Privacy Regulations: The New
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.