DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Premera Reaches Proposed $74M Settlement Over 2014 Breach of 11M

Posted on June 4, 2019 by Dissent

Jessica Davis reports:

Premera Blue Cross reached a proposed $74 million settlement with the 11 million patients impacted by its 2014 breach, caused by a sophisticated cyberattack that lasted for nearly one year before it was discovered.

In January 2015, Premera officials discovered the breach that began nearly a year earlier in May 2014. Premera, Premera Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alaska, and the insurer’s affiliates, Vivacity and Connexion Insurance Solutions were impacted, as well as patients who sought treatment in Alaska or Washington during that time period.

The breached data included member and applicant names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, bank account information, claims data, member identification numbers, and some clinical data.

Read more on Health IT Security.

Lawsuits over data breaches are a dime a dozen, but this litigation had a higher likelihood of settling due to a number of factors.  You can read previous news coverage of the breach and litigation on this site by following the links from these search results, but for now, I’ll just end this post with a quote from research by Sasha Romanosky, Hoffman, and Acquisti (2013):

In addition, we find that that the odds of a firm being sued are 3.5 times greater when individuals suffered financial harm, but over 6 times lower when the firm provides free credit monitoring to those affected by the breach. Moreover, the odds of a firm being sued as a result of improperly disposing data are 3 times greater relative to breaches caused by lost/stolen data, and 6 times greater when the data breach involved the loss of financial information. Our analysis suggests that defendants settle 30% more often when plaintiffs allege financial loss from a data breach, or when faced with a certified class action suit. The odds of a settlement are found to be 10 times greater when the breach is caused by a cyber-attack, relative to lost or stolen hardware, and the compromise of medical data increases the probability of settlement by 31%.

Romanosky, Sasha and Hoffman, David A. and Acquisti, Alessandro, Empirical Analysis of Data Breach Litigation (April 6, 2013). Forthcoming in the Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-30. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1986461 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1986461
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesHackHealth DataOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← Jewish dating app JCrush exposed user data and private messages
Unsurprisingly, big numbers from the AMCA breach are starting to be revealed →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ex-NSA bad-guy hunter listened to Scattered Spider’s fake help-desk calls: ‘Those guys are good’
  • Former Sussex Police officer facing trial for rape charged with 18 further offences relating to computer misuse
  • Beach mansion, Benz and Bitcoin worth $4.5m seized from League of Legends hacker Shane Stephen Duffy
  • Fresno County fell victim to $1.6M phishing scam in 2020. One suspected has been arrested, another has been indicted.
  • Ransomware Attack on ADP Partner Exposes Broadcom Employee Data
  • Anne Arundel ransomware attack compromised confidential health data, county says
  • Australian national known as “DR32” sentenced in U.S. federal court
  • Alabama Man Sentenced to 14 Months in Connection with Securities and Exchange Commission X Hack that Spiked Bitcoin Prices
  • Japan enacts new Active Cyberdefense Law allowing for offensive cyber operations
  • Breachforums Boss “Pompompurin” to Pay $700k in Healthcare Breach

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Massachusetts Senate Committee Approves Robust Comprehensive Privacy Law
  • Montana Becomes First State to Close the Law Enforcement Data Broker Loophole
  • Privacy enforcement under Andrew Ferguson’s FTC
  • “We would be less confidential than Google” – Proton threatens to quit Switzerland over new surveillance law
  • CFPB Quietly Kills Rule to Shield Americans From Data Brokers
  • South Korea fines Temu for data protection violations
  • The BR Privacy & Security Download: May 2025

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.