DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Brooklyn Hospital Center notifies patients after data could be not be recovered after malware attack

Posted on November 2, 2019 by Dissent

Brooklyn Hospital Center has issued a press release about a data incident that may not have resulted in access or exfiltration of patient data (they couldn’t determine that) but did result in their inability to recover certain data related to specific patients.

From their notice:

In late July 2019, the Hospital became aware of unusual activity relating to certain Hospital servers. The Hospital immediately commenced an investigation, which included working with a leading third-party forensic investigation firm, to determine the full nature and scope of the incident. Through this investigation, we determined that a malware that encrypted certain systems had disrupted the operation of certain Hospital systems; however, the investigation found no evidence that data was actually accessed or acquired by an unauthorized person(s). However, on September 4, 2019, the investigation confirmed that due to the malware, and despite exhaustive efforts by the Hospital to recover the data, certain patient data was unrecoverable.  While recovery efforts are ongoing, based on this determination, the Hospital is undertaking a diligent review of the patient data that may be potentially impacted by this event and taking steps to notify those individuals whose records may no longer be available.  To date, the Hospital are unaware of any actual or attempted access to or misuse of medical or personal information.

The unrecoverable information may include patient name and certain cardiac or dental images. As stated, there is no evidence to date of actual or attempted access to, acquisition of, or misuse of any medical or personal information related to this incident.

The full notice can be found at tbh.org/notice-data-event

DataBreaches.net contacted the hospital earlier this morning to inquire as to whether there had been any ransom demand, and whether the hospital had any usable backups of the data being described as unrecoverable (and if not, why not).  This post will be updated if answers are received.


Related:

  • US company with access to biggest telecom firms uncovers breach by nation-state hackers
  • Some lower-tier ransomware gangs have formed a new RaaS alliance -- or have they? (1)
  • Safaricom-Backed M-TIBA Victim of a Possible Data Breach Affecting Millions of Kenyans
  • Another plastic surgery practice fell prey to a cyberattack that acquired patient photos and info
  • NY: Gloversville hit by ransomware attack, paid ransom
  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
Category: Health DataMalwareU.S.

Post navigation

← Washington University School of Medicine notifies patients of HIPAA breach
Marriott notifies associates of breach at unnamed vendor →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.