DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Snatch ransomware team adds health insurer victim to their leak site

Posted on December 3, 2021 by Dissent

CareFirst CHP of DC logoIn April, CareFirst BlueCross Blue Shield  posted a notice on its website concerning a ransomware attack in January. The health plan’s announcement reports that the preliminary assessments suggested that:

 

the attack was limited to CHPDC. Early analysis also indicates that members of other CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield companies, the Federal Employees Program (FEP) and Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan (FEHBP) were not affected by this attack.

At the time, The Hill provided additional details about notifications to plan members.

Since then, however, there has not been any updated notice on CareFirst’s website.

DataBreaches.net sent an email inquiry to CareFirst seeking clarification of some issues but received no reply by publication time. But while there is much we still do not know, we have learned that Snatch Team has some involvement with the data.

Threat actors known as Snatch added CareFirst to their dark web leak site this week, claiming that 258 GB of data was exfiltrated.  The proof of claim files include half a dozen files with what appears to be protected health information. Some of the files posted seem to relate to Michigan residents and Harbor Health Plan in Michigan. In an email to DataBreaches.net, a spokesperson stated that they were not responsible for the attack.

Snatch Lists CareFirst
Image: DataBreaches.net

If CareFirst provides some answers, this post will be updated.

Updates:

A paragraph concerning notification to HHS was removed post-publication. The incident was reported to HHS on March 26, 2021 as impacting 200,665 members. It was reported under the name Trusted Health Plans, Inc.

Post-publication, Snatch Team informed DataBreaches.net that they were not responsible for the attack on CareFirst so the statements attributing the breach to them have been edited to reflect that they listed the data on their site but stated that they were not responsible for the attack.


Related:

  • KT Chief to Resign After Cybersecurity Breach Resolution
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • A business's cyber insurance policy included ransom coverage, but when they needed it, the insurer refused to pay. Why?
  • Before Their Telegram Channel Was Banned Again, ScatteredLAPSUS$Hunters Dropped Files Doxing Government Employees (2)
Category: Breach IncidentsMalwareU.S.

Post navigation

← Oops! County explains how driver’s licenses were posted in place of animal adoption photos
NY: Riverhead schools hit by ransomware attack, shutting down computer and tech infrastructure →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.