DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

The definitions of “recently” and “discovered” leave a lot to be desired

Posted on January 15, 2022 by Dissent

In March, 2021, Family Health Services MN d/b/a Entira Family Clinics notified the Maryland Attorney General’s Office that they had been impacted by the Netgain ransomware attack that affected more than one dozen covered entities and more than 1 million patients.

Entira’s external counsel’s letter of March 1, 2021, identified the dates upon which Netgain had first notified Entira of the incident (December 20, 2020) and then notified them that some of Entira’s data had been removed from the network by the threat actors (January 4, 2021). By the March 1 letter, Entira had already investigated to determine who had data potentially compromised, and what kind of information.

So why, on January 13, 2022, does Entira send a letter to patients in Maine that begins:

Entira Family Clinics is a family medicine practice with locations across Minnesota. We recently discovered that a data security incident on Netgain’s environment may have resulted in the unintentional exposure of your personal information. This letter contains additional information about the incident, our response to the incident, and steps you can take to protect yourself. Please be assured that Entira takes the protection and proper use of personal information very seriously, and we sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

They “recently discovered?”  Recently?  Ten months after Maryland was notified, Maine residents first get notified?

This notification letter does not tell the recipient when the incident occurred, when Entira was first notified about it, and when Entira first discovered any PHI was involved.  Why did Maryland residents get such detailed information but not Maine residents?

Now I grant you that there were apparently (only) nine Maine residents out of a total of 199,628 patients who needed to be notified about this breach, but this is still infuriating.

And if you are surprised to learn that almost 200,000 patients were impacted by this breach, rest assured that you didn’t miss anything. Entira reported this breach to HHS in March, 2021 as impacting 1975 patients and there has been no update to that listing on HHS’s public breach tool.

Updated January 15: It appears Caring Communities Shared Services has sent  the same letter to an unspecified number of people. Why it took them until now to notify people is unknown to this site and no listing could be found on HHS’s public breach tool.

 

 

 

Related posts:

  • Proposed class action settlement in In re Netgain Technology litigation
Category: Breach Incidents

Post navigation

← Guilford Technical Community College notifies 65,646 affected by ransomware incident in 2020
Polish DPA imposes a fine on Warsaw University of Technology for not complying with its obligation →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Hunters International to provide free decryptors for all victims as they shut down (1)
  • SEC and SolarWinds Seek Settlement in Securities Fraud Case
  • Cyberattacks Disrupt Iran’s Bread Distribution, Payments Remain Frozen
  • Hacker with ‘political agenda’ stole data from Columbia, university says
  • Keymous+ Hacker Group Claims Responsibility for Over 700 Global DDoS Attacks
  • Data breach reveals Catwatchful ‘stalkerware’ is spying on thousands of phones
  • DOJ investigates ex-ransomware negotiator over extortion kickbacks
  • Hackers Using PDFs to Impersonate Microsoft, DocuSign, and More in Callback Phishing Campaigns
  • One in Five Law Firms Hit by Cyberattacks Over Past 12 Months
  • U.S. Sanctions Russian Bulletproof Hosting Provider for Supporting Cybercriminals Behind Ransomware

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Record-Breaking $1.55M CCPA Settlement Against Health Information Website Publisher
  • Ninth Circuit Reviews Website Tracking Class Actions and the Reach of California’s Privacy Law
  • US healthcare offshoring: Navigating patient data privacy laws and regulations
  • Data breach reveals Catwatchful ‘stalkerware’ is spying on thousands of phones
  • Google Trackers: What You Can Actually Escape And What You Can’t
  • Oregon Amends Its Comprehensive Privacy Statute
  • Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Liberal Majority Strikes Down 176-Year-Old Abortion Ban

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.