DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Ca: SLGA business partners should have figured out on their own that their data may have been stolen: minister

Posted on April 7, 2022 by Dissent

Geoff Leo reports on what sounds like an utterly unsatisfactory response by the government to questions as to why it didn’t directly notify those affected of a breach:

The minister responsible for the Saskatchewan Liquor and Gaming Authority (SLGA) says the Crown corporation didn’t directly notify its business partners that their data may have been stolen in a hack because those companies should have figured it out on their own.

According to a Dec 28 news release, SLGA’s computer systems were the target of a “cyber security incident” on Christmas Day. It said that at that time, “SLGA does not have any evidence that the security of any customer, employee or other personal data has been misused.” The organization repeated that line in communications with business partners.

Three weeks after the hack, the organization alerted employees that their data may have been stolen and offered them credit monitoring services.

At that time, it gave no such notification to SLGA’s suppliers, vendors or licensees.

So the government told them they had no evidence, but then only told some of those affected when the risk level changed after they did find evidence. They didn’t directly update/notify the others?

[…]

In an email, SLGA told CBC it is required by law to notify people whose data may have been unlawfully accessed and may be misused. The organization said rather than notify the potential victims directly, it decided to use the “indirect notification” approach, posting an update on its website.

SLGA says in a written statement on its website that Saskatchewan’s privacy commissioner has given the thumbs up to this indirect approach in cases “where the privacy breach is potentially very large or you may not be able to identify the affected individuals.”

Ah, the old “indirect notification approach,” otherwise known as “We can’t be expected to act responsibly after we were breached, so you’re kind of on your own. 🙁 ”

Unbelievable.  At the very least, the government should have plastered big press releases in national media and popular provincial media.

Read more at CBC.

h/t, Brett Callow, who has his own thoughts on the matter.

 


Related:

  • A Swath of Bank Customer Data Was Hacked. The F.B.I. Is Investigating.
  • Ph: Department of the Interior and Local Government to probe alleged data breach by hackers
  • Cyberattack disables Onsolve Code Red emergency alert system across St. Louis region (1)
  • Two suspected Scattered Spider hackers plead not guilty over Transport for London cyberattack
  • Attleboro investigating ‘cybersecurity incident' impacting city's IT systems
  • Threat actors have reportedly launched yet another campaign involving an application connected to Salesforce
Category: Government SectorHack

Post navigation

← SuperCare Health notifies 318,379 patients of July breach
Pentester for FIN7 sentenced for scheme that compromised tens of millions of debit and credit cards →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Akira ransomware: FBI tallies 250 million in payouts
  • IE: HSE confirms second ransomware attack but ‘no evidence’ patient data was stolen
  • Examining impact of federal relief program after major healthcare cyberattack — Research Brief
  • Justice Department Announces Actions to Combat Two Russian State-Sponsored Hacking Groups
  • Should entities be required to disclose the name of a vendor if the breach was at the vendor’s?
  • The Hidden Risks of Information Disclosure: A Costly Lesson from Cornwall
  • Defense Bill Would Require New Cyber Requirements for Some DoD Telecom Contracts
  • Tell the truth, or someone will tell it for you — Trumbull County, Ohio edition (1)
  • US Posts $10 Million Bounty for Iranian Hackers
  • South Korea police raid e-commerce giant Coupang over data leak; govt schedules hearing

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • FTC Denies Petition from SpyFone App CEO to Vacate 2021 Order
  • Privacy concerns raised as Grok AI found to be a stalker’s best friend
  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)
  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.