DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

NYS Comptroller releases another school district IT audit

Posted on January 18, 2023 by Dissent

Frankfort-Schuyler Central School District – Information Technology Assets and Network Access (2022M-151)

Released December 30, 2022

Background

The District serves the Towns of Frankfort and Schuyler in Herkimer County.

The District is governed by the Board of Education (Board), which is composed of seven elected members. The Board is responsible for the general management and control of the District’s financial and educational affairs.

The Superintendent of Schools (Superintendent) is the District’s chief executive officer and is responsible, along with other administrative staff, for the District’s day-to-day management under the Board’s direction.

The District’s Assistant Superintendent of Business and Technology (Assistant Superintendent) and Superintendent are responsible for managing the District’s IT operations, in conjunction with a Network Administrator and a computer technical assistant.

Audit Period

July 1, 2020 – December 20, 2021

Audit Objective

Determine whether Frankfort-Schuyler Central School District (District) officials maintained appropriate information technology (IT) asset inventory records and established adequate controls over network user accounts.

Key Findings

District officials did not maintain appropriate IT asset inventory records or establish adequate IT controls over network user accounts. In addition to sensitive IT weaknesses communicated confidentially, District officials did not:

  • Develop written procedures for tracking IT assets. Nine of 31 devices (laptops, desktops and tablets) we tested were not located.
  • Adequately manage network user accounts. Sixty-five network user accounts were not needed.
  • Enter into a service level agreement (SLA) with each of the District’s IT service providers to clearly identify the IT services and providers’ responsibilities. Over a half million dollars was paid to IT service providers.

In addition, because officials did not develop a written IT contingency plan there is an increased risk that the District could lose important data and suffer a serious interruption to operations, such as not being able to process paychecks, vendor payments, student grades or State aid claims.

Key Recommendations

  • Establish adequate procedures, plans and agreements needed to protect the District’s IT assets, network and data.

District officials generally agreed with our recommendations and initiated or indicated they planned to initiate corrective action. Appendix B includes our comment on an issue raised in the District’s response letter

Source.

Read the complete report.


Related:

  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • Resource: NY DFS Issues New Cybersecurity Guidance to Address Risks Associated with the Use of Third-Party Service Providers
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
  • Bombay High Court Orders Department of Telecommunications to Block Medusa Accounts After Generali Insurance Data Breach
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesEducation SectorU.S.

Post navigation

← DNV Confirms Ransomware Attack Impacting 1,000 Ships
HHS issues two warnings: one about Royal & BlackCat Ransomware, and one about AI’s potential use in malware →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.