DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

AmerisourceBergen MWI Animal Health hit by Lorenz; Company investigating

Posted on February 8, 2023 by Dissent

The Lorenz ransomware group has added AmerisourceBergen/MWI Animal Health to their leak site with what teasingly appears to be a lot of data, except there is no key to unlock the leaked files. Those who want the key will have to contact Lorenz and buy the key.

Listing on Lorenz shows icons for 16 parts of a data leak.
Listing on Lorenz’s leak site indicates a data leak for sale although it does not name a price. It also provides a listing of files that appear linked to the animal health subsidiary. Image: DataBreaches.net.

Lorenz did provide a file list as a sample, but the filenames in the list suggest that the files are personnel-related and internal files related to the MWI Animal Health subsidiary.  AmerisourceBergen functions as a business associate under HIPAA, but this attack may be limited to the animal health division. Consistent with that,  AmerisourceBergen’s statement to DataBreaches suggests that the attack was of one subsidiary.

DataBreaches sent an email inquiry to AmerisourceBergen to ask if (human) patient data was accessed or acquired, and whether the attack occurred November 1 (because that date shows up on Lorenz’s listing).  DataBreaches also asked what regulators have been notified, and whether any files had been locked.

In response, Lauren Esposito Vice President, External & Executive Communications, provided the following statement which they say addresses the questions posed:

AmerisourceBergen’s internal investigation quickly identified that a subsidiary’s IT system was compromised. We immediately engaged the appropriate  teams to limit the intrusion, contained the disruption and took precautionary measures to ensure all systems were and are now clear of any intrusions. This was an isolated incident and we are in the process of investigating to determine whether any sensitive data was compromised. We take our responsibility to protect data very seriously and continue to secure and strengthen our networks to prevent any future issues.

Clearly, the statement does not address the question about November 1, it does not address the question about whether any files were locked, and it does not answer the question about what regulators may have been notified already.  The only thing it comes close to addressing is whether any patient data was involved, and that seems to be under investigation.

DataBreaches will update this post if additional information becomes available.


Related:

  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • A business's cyber insurance policy included ransom coverage, but when they needed it, the insurer refused to pay. Why?
  • Before Their Telegram Channel Was Banned Again, ScatteredLAPSUS$Hunters Dropped Files Doxing Government Employees (2)
  • Massachusetts hospitals Heywood, Athol say outage was a cybersecurity incident
  • Data BreachesProsper Data Breach Impacts 17.6 Million Accounts
Category: Business SectorMalwareU.S.

Post navigation

← Hidalgo County Adult Probation Office hit by ransomware attack
NYS Comptroller DiNapoli releases another concerning school district IT audit →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says
  • The Case for Making EdTech Companies Liable Under FERPA
  • NHS providers reviewing stolen Synnovis data published by cyber criminals

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.