DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

NYS Comptroller DiNapoli releases another concerning school district IT audit

Posted on February 9, 2023 by Dissent

Montauk Union Free School District –  Information Technology (2022M-137)

Issued Date: January 27, 2023

Audit Objective

Determine whether Montauk Union Free School District (District) officials secured access to the network and financial application and developed an information technology (IT) contingency plan.

Background

The District is located in the Town of East Hampton in Suffolk County and operates one school (prekindergarten through eighth grade).

The District is governed by an elected five-member Board of Education (Board) responsible for the general management and control of the District’s financial and educational affairs. The Superintendent of Schools (Superintendent) is the chief executive officer and is responsible, along with other administrative staff, for the District’s day-to-day management under the Board’s direction.

The Treasurer is responsible for managing the District’s financial operations and setting up users within the financial application. One of the District’s teachers is responsible for managing the District’s IT systems and assets (IT Director).

Audit Period

July 1, 2020 – July 15, 2022

Key Findings

Although District officials restricted access to the financial application, they did not adequately secure access to the network or develop an IT contingency plan. As a result, there is an increased risk that the network may be accessed by unauthorized individuals, data will be lost and the District may not be able to recover from a network disruption or disaster. In addition to sensitive IT control weaknesses that were confidentially communicated to officials, we found:

    • Twenty-five percent, or 140, of the District’s network user accounts were not needed.
    • Two unknown individuals had an active network user account.
    • IT security awareness training was not provided.

Since 2013-14, external auditors have annually recommended that the District develop an IT contingency plan. However, the District never developed the plan and could not provide a reasonable explanation for failing to do so.

Key Recommendations

    • Periodically review network user accounts and disable any unnecessary accounts as soon as they are no longer needed.
    • Provide periodic IT security awareness training.
    • Develop and adopt a comprehensive written IT contingency plan.

District officials generally agreed with our recommendations and indicated they planned to initiate corrective action. Appendix B includes our comment on an issue raised in the District’s response letter.

[Read complete report – pdf]

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesEducation Sector

Post navigation

← AmerisourceBergen MWI Animal Health hit by Lorenz; Company investigating
Insurers Say Cyberattack That Hit Merck Was Warlike Act, Not Covered →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Dutch police identify users on Cracked.io
  • Help, please: Seeking copies of the PowerSchool ransom email(s)
  • RCMP thumb drive with informant, witness data obtained by criminals: watchdog
  • Evoke Wellness to Pay $1.9 Million to Settle FTC Claims That They Misled Consumers Seeking Substance Use Disorder Treatment
  • Former Hilliard treatment center employee accused of selling patient data on dark web
  • Trump Rewrites Cybersecurity Policy in Executive Order
  • AMI Group – Travel & Tours notice of ransomware attack
  • Resource: Insider Threat reports
  • Za: Cyber extortionist sentenced to eight years in jail
  • ICE takes steps to deport the Australian hacker known as “DR32”

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Republicans Move A Step Closer To Repealing Protections For Abortion Clinics
  • Democrats introduce bill that aims to protect reproductive health data
  • Don’t Mind If I Do: Montana Says Hands Off Neural Data
  • 23andMe leadership grilled by lawmakers demanding answers about data security amid bankruptcy sale
  • Privacy Victory! Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in OPM/DOGE Lawsuit
  • The Decision That Murdered Privacy
  • Hearing on the Federal Government and AI

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.