DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

PDPC penalizes Eatigo over data protection failures leading to 2020 breach

Posted on March 10, 2023 by Dissent

On October 31, 2020, Eatigo reported a data breach of customer data and that the data had been put up for sale on a popular forum.

The Personal Data Protection Commission investigated and found that:

 the personal data for sale on the online forum did not match any current databases in use by the Organisation at the time of the Incident, but matched the structure of a legacy database which contained user data as of late 2018, when the database was last updated (the “Affected Database”). The Affected Database was hosted on the infrastructure of a Cloud Service Provider located in Singapore, and was previously in use by the Organisation until 2018. Thereafter, the Organisation migrated to its current online platform, which entailed a complete redevelopment of data storage and infrastructure. Whilst the Organisation did not intend to continue to utilise the personal data contained in the Affected Database, it was nevertheless retained to support the migration of data to the new platform. After the migration, the Affected Database was not included in the Organisation’s Virtual Private Network (“VPN”) infrastructure. Unfortunately, as the Organisation transitioned to the current engineering team, knowledge of the Affected Database was lost.

Additional findings can be found in the PDPC’s report on the incident and findings, including:

The Affected Database contained personal data relating to approximately 2.76 million individuals, encompassing personal data such as passwords, access IDs and Facebook tokens. Given the high volume of personal data contained in the Affected Database, it was incumbent on the Organisation to implement policies and practices to meet such security needs to discharge its obligation under the Protection Obligation.

The commission issued a financial penalty of $62,400 as part of its response to the incident. The report notes that the organization’s noncooperative responses to the commission’s inquiries were aggravating factors.


Related:

  • How a hacking gang held Italy’s political elites to ransom
  • Uncovering Qilin attack methods exposed through multiple cases
  • Predatory Sparrow Strikes: Coordinated Cyberattacks Seek to Cripple Iran's Critical Infrastructure
  • Ex-CISA head thinks AI might fix code so fast we won't need security teams
  • On Reports of an Alleged Data Breach Involving G-Xchange, Inc. (GCash)
  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
Category: Breach IncidentsBusiness SectorCommentaries and AnalysesHackNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← Cerebral Inc. notifying 3,179,835 patients of tracking technologies breach
EPA Requires States to Address the Cybersecurity of Public Water Systems →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says
  • The Case for Making EdTech Companies Liable Under FERPA
  • NHS providers reviewing stolen Synnovis data published by cyber criminals

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.