DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu
NDI

Birth Choice of San Marcos to notify patients of breach at National Diagnostic Imaging

Posted on October 19, 2024 by Dissent

On March 16, 2024, National Diagnostic Imaging (NDI) experienced a network disruption. Their investigation subsequently revealed that they had been the victim of unauthorized access between February 19, 2024, and March 27, 2024. According to a letter from one of their clients, they notified Birth Choice of San Marcos on August 19 of the scope of the breach affecting their patient data. On October 15, Birth Choice of San Marcos was provided with the results of the data breach review that identified who was affected, the type of information, and the contact information to notify the patients.

Letters will be sent out on October 22 to Birth Choice of San Marcos patients who were affected. A sample of the letter provided to the California Attorney General’s Office indicates that the type of information included client names, dates of birth, LMP (Last Menstrual Period), pertinent clinical information, and biometrics for the radiologist’s diagnoses.

The number of patients affected was not disclosed in the letter, and the incident has not yet shown up on HHS’s public breach tool (if there were more than 500 patients affected).

Were Any Other Clients Affected?

National Diagnostic Imaging is a US-based teleradiology company founded In 2003. It provides subspecialty radiology interpretation and reading services via teleradiology to hospitals, referring physicians, healthcare providers, and patients throughout the U.S.

There is no substitute notice on NDI’s website about any data security incident. While it seems somewhat unlikely that only one provider would be affected by an attack on NDI, it is possible. As examples: if an infostealer compromised a Birth Choice employee’s access credentials to NDI or an employee fell for a phishing attack that compromised access to NDI, it could be that the pregnancy care center was the only affected entity.

DataBreaches submitted an inquiry to NDI via their contact form. The inquiry asked whether Birth Control of San Marcos was their only client affected, and if not, how many other clients, or how many patients total, were affected by the incident.  DataBreaches also inquired whether this incident involved any ransom or extortion demand and, if so, which group or threat actor had contacted them. No reply was immediately available.

This post will be updated if more information becomes available or a response is received, but Birth Choice of San Marcos is a non-profit that provides free medical care to women and men. It receives no federal or state funding and is funded by private donations.  That revenue model does not seem to be a good target for any financially motivated threat actors.

As of publication, no group has claimed responsibility for either Birth Choice of San Marcos or NDI.


Related:

  • KT Chief to Resign After Cybersecurity Breach Resolution
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • John Bolton Indictment Provides Interesting Details About Hack of His AOL Account and Extortion Attempt
  • UK: 'Catastrophic' attack as Russians hack files on EIGHT MoD bases and post them on the dark web
Category: Breach IncidentsHealth DataOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← OCR Releases Cybersecurity Video: Ransomware Update
Cisco takes DevHub portal offline after hacker publishes stolen data →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.