DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Canadian citizen allegedly involved in Snowflake attacks consents to extradition to US

Posted on March 27, 2025 by Dissent

Matt Kapko reports that a Canadian national has consented to be extradited to the United States to face federal charges that could send him away for a long, long time:

A Canadian citizen is one step closer to standing trial in the United States for his alleged involvement in a series of attacks targeting as many as 165 Snowflake customers, one of the most widespread and damaging attack sprees on record.

Connor Moucka consented to extradition on Friday to face 20 federal charges, including conspiracy to commit computer fraud, accessing protected computers without authorization, transmitting threats to undermine the confidentiality of information, wire fraud and aggravated identity theft.

Moucka, who used several aliases online, including “Waifu,” “Judische,” “Catist” and “Ellyel8,” was arrested Oct. 30, 2024, in Kitchener, a city in the Canadian province of Ontario, at the behest of U.S. authorities. Federal prosecutors released their indictment of Moucka and one of his co-conspirators, John Binns, in November.

Read more at CyberScoop.

Given the strained relationship between the U.S. and Canada right now, DataBreaches wonders what would have happened if Moucka had not consented and a Canadian court used its authority to deny approval to extradite him to the U.S.  His signed consent to surrender does not explain his reasons for consenting, but “counsel for the person sought” is signed by someone who was presumably his legal counsel, although the name is not typed under the signature and DataBreaches could not read the signature clearly.

Was his counsel a court-appointed lawyer or did Moucka have an attorney he retained? Did his counsel encourage him to consent to extradition or did Moucka make the decision to consent despite his counsel’s advice?  Was there any psychological evaluation before he consented that indicated that he was fully competent to make decisions or was he in a psychological state such that he could not truly consent freely? DataBreaches is not suggesting that there was any wrongdoing, but to consent to be sent to a country that wants to put you in federal prison for a long time just makes me curious about his thought processes and decision-making.


Related:

  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • John Bolton Indictment Provides Interesting Details About Hack of His AOL Account and Extortion Attempt
  • UK: 'Catastrophic' attack as Russians hack files on EIGHT MoD bases and post them on the dark web
  • Data BreachesProsper Data Breach Impacts 17.6 Million Accounts
  • The Alliance That Wasn’t: A Critical Analysis of ReliaQuest’s Q3 2025 Ransomware Report
  • F5 discloses breach tied to nation-state threat actor
Category: Business SectorOf Note

Post navigation

← Four months after learning of a vendor’s breach, Concord Orthopaedics notifies almost 68,000 patients (1)
Furry hackers who leaked Project 2025 firm’s data fear leader raided by feds →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says
  • The Case for Making EdTech Companies Liable Under FERPA
  • NHS providers reviewing stolen Synnovis data published by cyber criminals
  • Gates Down: Third Circuit Says Breaking Employer Computer Access Policies Is Not Hacking
  • Short-term renewal of cyber information sharing law appears in bill to end shutdown
  • Yanluowang ransomware IAB pleads guilty
  • Lawsuit Alleges Ex-Intel Employee Hid 18,000 Sensitive Documents Prior to Leaving the Company
  • HIPAA, but for non-Covered Entities?
  • Manassas City Public Schools close on Monday due to cyberattack

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map
  • EPIC Publishes New Whitepaper Detailing Privacy Risks of Government Data Mining Programs
  • Modern cars are spying on you. Here’s what you can do about it.

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.