DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

From $5,000 to $800,000: Days Apart, OCR Security Settlements Show Puzzling Math

Posted on June 24, 2025 by Dissent

More great reporting and analysis by Therese Defino of the Health Care Compliance Association (HCCA):

A single incident that may have started as a personal vendetta or an extortion threat seven years ago has cost a Florida health care system $800,000, and comes on the heels of an unrelated breach suffered by a different hospital in the same organization just last year.

The payment by Clearwater, Fla.-based BayCare Health System, which the HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) announced May 15,[1] was the third priciest of 2025, following a $3 million settlement with a diabetes supply firm and a $1.5 million fine OCR imposed on eyewear vendor Warby Parker.[2]

BayCare’s was one of three OCR enforcement actions the agency made public in May; all were accompanied by two-year corrective action plans (CAPs).

On May 30, two days after the BayCare announcement, OCR said a business associate (BA) in Rowley, Mass., agreed to a $75,000 settlement stemming from a 2022 ransomware attack that encrypted the protected health information (PHI) of nearly 560,000 patients of 70 covered entities (CEs) it served.[3]

All three settlements contribute to the long-standing puzzle of how OCR determines financial payment amounts, bedeviling CEs, BAs, attorneys and experts alike. Vision Upright MRI of San Jose, Calif., agreed to pay just $5,000 to settle allegations that it failed both to conduct a security risk analysis and didn’t notify the 22,000 affected individuals within the required 60 days.[4]

As of June 1, OCR had issued 15 enforcement actions this year, nine of which were announced by former OCR Director Melanie Fontes Rainer, a Biden appointee who resigned in mid-January and later shared exclusively with RPP her concerns about the future of the agency.[5] OCR has collected a total of $7,610,316 from its enforcement actions so far this year.

Read more at JDSupra.


Related:

  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • John Bolton Indictment Provides Interesting Details About Hack of His AOL Account and Extortion Attempt
  • A business's cyber insurance policy included ransom coverage, but when they needed it, the insurer refused to pay. Why?
  • Before Their Telegram Channel Was Banned Again, ScatteredLAPSUS$Hunters Dropped Files Doxing Government Employees (2)
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesHealth DataU.S.

Post navigation

← Liberty Township in Ohio has recovered its network after a ransomware attack
Dublin ETB fined €125,000 for data protection breaches →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.