DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Inadequate security measures: the Guarantor sanctions an ASL. The healthcare facility had suffered a ransomware attack

Posted on October 27, 2023 by Dissent

The following is a Google machine translation of a post by Italy’s data protection regulator.  It strikes me yet again how entities covered by the GDPR get fined for poor or inadequate security practices that should — but generally do not — incur monetary penalties here:

Sanction by the Privacy Guarantor of 30,000 euros to a Neapolitan local health authority for failing to adequately protect the personal data and health data of 842,000 patients and employees from hacker attacks.

The healthcare facility had suffered a ransomware attack which, through a virus, had limited access to the healthcare facility’s database and requested a ransom to restore the functioning of the systems.

As required by the legislation on the protection of personal data, the ASL had communicated the data breach to the Guarantor who immediately opened an investigation into the incident to verify the technical and organizational measures adopted by the ASL both before and after the attack right away.

Several important critical issues were identified by the Guarantor following the inspection activity, such as the failure to adopt adequate measures to promptly detect the violation of personal data and to guarantee the security of the networks, also in violation of the principle of data protection by design (privacy by design). Access to the network via VPN took place through an authentication procedure based only on the use of username and password. Furthermore, the lack of network segmentation had caused the virus to spread throughout the entire IT infrastructure.

In sanctioning the offense, the Guarantor took into account the fact that the data breach concerned data suitable for collecting information on the health of a very significant number of interested parties, but also the unintentional and collaborative attitude of the Local Health Authority. After the incident, the company adopted a series of measures aimed not only at mitigating the damage suffered by the interested parties, but also at reducing the replicability of the event itself, including the activation of a network access procedure via VPN with double factor authentication.

 



Related:

  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • Romanian prisoner hacks prison IT system in plot made for a Netflix movie
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • John Bolton Indictment Provides Interesting Details About Hack of His AOL Account and Extortion Attempt
  • UK: 'Catastrophic' attack as Russians hack files on EIGHT MoD bases and post them on the dark web
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesHealth DataMalwareNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← Hackers escalate: leak 200k CCSD students’ data; claim to still have access to CCSD email system
Six months after data security incident, Fredericksburg Foot & Ankle Center notifies patients (1) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.