DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

UK: ICO reports on community healthcare providers’ data protection

Posted on January 28, 2015 by Dissent

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has today published a report looking at how community healthcare providers approach data protection.

Community providers are an increasingly important part of the NHS, providing cradle to grave services worth over £11 billion a year. But they often involve staff working at remote locations or off-site entirely. This brings particular data protection challenges.

The report provides an analysis of data breaches in the sector that shows a trend of information being ‘disclosed in error’ – a problem that can be addressed by following the tips in the report.

The ICO good practice team’s programme of audit and information risk reviews from October 2013 to date included four audits and three information risk reviews of community health providers. Mental health trusts were not included in the analyses.  Of note, only 8%  (34) of all of the reports the ICO saw related to community health providers, and

  • 24 of these related to paper based information
  • Only 5 of these related to deliberate or reckless disclosure or unauthorised access. Most related to information lost, disclosed or mislaid in error
  • 10 related to digital information, of which 9 were categorised as disclosed in error
  • In cases where electronic information was involved, more information was generally disclosed per breach reported.

The ICO offered the following tips:

  1. Know what you hold and where: be aware of what personal data you hold, and map where it goes.
  2. Ensure staff awareness of basic security: this is key to reducing the number of serious data breaches.
  3. Don’t forget training: the off-site nature of work of a large number of community healthcare roles means there can be a low uptake of training.
  4. Develop guidelines for taking patient information off site: this is clearly an area of information risk, and it is key that staff are thinking about how information is looked after when it leaves the office.
  5. Ensure central oversight of the records management process: the wide geographic area covered by many providers means records management can be fragmented and inconsistent.

SOURCE: Information Commissioner’s Office

A previous version of this post incorrectly reported the time period for the review and audits.


Related:

  • CISA Alert: Reported Supply Chain Compromise Affecting XZ Utils Data Compression Library, CVE-2024-3094
  • System Status Note
  • System Status Note
  • System Status Note
  • Fraudster's fake data breach claims should remind media to be careful what we report
  • "Pompompurin" taken into custody after violating conditions of pre-sentencing release on bond (1)
Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← PA: Woman Charged In A Multi-State Bank Fraud And Identity Theft Scheme
Quinn Norton: We Should All Step Back from Security Journalism. I’ll Go First. →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.