DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

NY: Two-Factor Authentication May Be Coming to a Bank Near You

Posted on March 3, 2015 by Dissent

David Smyth of Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, LLP writes:

When I was at the SEC and online broker-dealers’ customers were the victims of hacking incidents, I used to wonder, why don’t the broker-dealers require multi-factor authentication to gain access to accounts? It was a silly question. I knew the answer. Multi-factor authentication is a pain and nobody likes it.

[…]

But here comes Ben Lawsky, the Superintendent of New York’s Department of Financial Services, who just unveiled a number of proposals to increase cybersecurity at banks under his jurisdiction. One of these is to require that banks use multi-factor authentication. This move could take a lot of the economic pressure off banks that would otherwise like to implement this control for its customers, but have been unwilling to do so for fear of losing those customers to rivals. If everybody has to do it, there’s not a lot of fear from imposing it unilaterally.

Read more on National Law Review.


Related:

  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • Before Their Telegram Channel Was Banned Again, ScatteredLAPSUS$Hunters Dropped Files Doxing Government Employees (2)
  • Massachusetts hospitals Heywood, Athol say outage was a cybersecurity incident
Category: State/LocalU.S.

Post navigation

← Hospital Sues Bank of America Over Million-Dollar Cyberheist
TX: “Bitcoin Baron” attacked City of San Marcos and San Marcos PD websites in retaliation for assault on student →

1 thought on “NY: Two-Factor Authentication May Be Coming to a Bank Near You”

  1. Eric Pearson says:
    March 4, 2015 at 10:42 am

    This guy is way behind the curve. FFIEC regulations already require banks to utilize multi-factor authentication. He is just trying to make himself seem like a cyber superhero…….which he is not. The regulation was issued JUNE 2011.

    Summary: The FDIC, with the other FFIEC agencies, has issued the attached guidance, which describes
    updated supervisory expectations regarding customer authentication, layered security, and other controls in
    an increasingly hostile online environment. Financial institutions will be expected to comply with the guidance
    no later than January 1, 2012.

    This FFIEC guidance supplements the FDIC’s
    supervisory expectations regarding customer
    authentication, layered security, and other controls in
    an increasingly hostile online environment.
     The FDIC expects institutions to upgrade their controls
    for high-risk online transactions through:
    o Yearly risk assessments;
    o For consumer accounts, layered security
    controls;
    o For business accounts, layered security
    controls consistent with the increased level of
    risk posed by business accounts; and
    o More active consumer awareness and
    education efforts.
     Layered security controls should include processes to
    detect and respond to suspicious or anomalous
    activity and, for business accounts, administrative
    controls.
     Certain types of device identification and challenge
    questions should no longer be considered effective
    controls.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says
  • The Case for Making EdTech Companies Liable Under FERPA
  • NHS providers reviewing stolen Synnovis data published by cyber criminals

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.