DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

A 2011 breach rears its ugly head again?

Posted on April 27, 2015 by Dissent

It seems that everywhere I go, I stumble over breaches that I didn’t know about. Today, something on Findlaw showed up in searches. It said:

I am unfortunately a victim of identity theft as of 2014. I just found out about it in february of 2015. Luckily for me the thieves did not do too much harm to my credit but I do have a concern. After I reported my identity theft in February 2015 I received a letter in the mail from the Michigan Department of State in March 2015 stating that there was a data breach in 2011 at a Secretary of State and my documents were among those that were taken from their system and my papers were recently retrieved by law enforcement. Now I was not notified about this data breach until 2015.

So I searched this blog and couldn’t find where I had ever noted any such incident. I reached out to the state, who kindly pointed me to this notice from 2011:

SOS Uncovers Thefts at 2 Branches; State Police to Investigate

AUGUST 26, 2011

SOS officials to alert customers as a precaution

Lansing — As a precaution, Michigan Secretary of State officials announced they will be notifying customers about thefts in two Macomb County branches, in which driver’s license applications and state ID applications were stolen.

The thefts occurred at the Southwest Macomb PLUS Office, 28220 Dequindre Road, in Warren and the North Macomb PLUS Office, 51305 Gratiot Ave., in Chesterfield Township.

“We take our responsibility to ensure confidential information is secure seriously and that’s why we immediately began an internal investigation and in-depth audit so we could determine which customers might be affected,” said Tracy Ward, Michigan Department of State spokesperson. “As a precaution, we will be sending letters next week to each individual customer who may be affected. We have formally requested the Michigan State Police conduct a criminal investigation into the theft. We want whoever did this prosecuted to the full extent of the law.”

In addition to providing information on fraud and identity theft to individual customers, Department officials will be providing a special information line for affected customers to call for additional information.

Through the audit, SOS officials have identified 13,966 documents that are missing. The documents, which date from 2009, were secured in locked, non-public areas of the branches.

“We apologize for any inconvenience to our customers and will do everything in our power to assist them now and in the future,” Ward said. “We have also taken steps to enhance both our document processing and security systems.”

Department officials have instituted other changes, including:

  • Changes in document retention policies.
  • Expanded use of microfilming and document shredding.
  • An upcoming review of security procedures by the Michigan State Police.
  • Expanded security camera use throughout the branch system.

Some of the documents contained Social Security numbers, which the Secretary of State’s office is required to collect under state and federal law. The documents did not include credit card or financial account information.

A spokesperson for the state added:

Due to new information provided to the department, we again in March 2015 sent a letter to potentially affected customers to encourage them to protect themselves.

DataBreaches.net reached out to the Michigan State Police to inquire whether these were insider thefts and how many individuals’ records they recovered. If I get a response, this post will be updated.


Related:

  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Data breach in 42 Latvian municipalities: DVI imposes 300,000 euro fine on ZZ Dats
  • Kaufman County's data breach was their second one in three weeks
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
Category: Breach IncidentsGovernment SectorPaperTheftU.S.

Post navigation

← IN: Prosecutor: Some Warrick child support files affected by virus
More than 1 year after breach, data show up for sale on darknet →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says
  • The Case for Making EdTech Companies Liable Under FERPA
  • NHS providers reviewing stolen Synnovis data published by cyber criminals

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.