DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Ca: Patient names to stay private

Posted on December 4, 2010 by Dissent

Pamela Cowan reports:

Protecting the privacy of patients trumps raising donor dollars for the province’s hospital foundations — at least for now.

This spring, the provincial government amended health privacy regulations so health regions could share with their local hospital foundation the names and addresses of people who’d received hospital services.

The policy set out a 60-day waiting period before health foundations could send a letter soliciting donations and no information about a patient’s diagnosis was provided. In addition, there was a provision for patients to opt out if they didn’t want their personal information given to a health foundation.

However, some residents in the Regina Qu’Appelle Health Region voiced their opposition to the amendment.

“We have decided that we won’t be releasing patient information to fundraising bodies,” said Dwight Nelson, CEO of the RQHR. “There was the sense that the public, in general, didn’t like the idea of having to explicitly opt out or otherwise they’d be contacted … Our board members certainly heard from some members of the public and, in general, people weren’t very enthused about having their information released.”

Read more in the Regina Leader-Post.

I think this is the right decision. Let people opt-in or find some other way. And I wish U.S. regulations were also more protective of patients’ names and contact info when it comes to acceptable use of such information.

No related posts.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Is “Data Mining” of Prescription and Patient Records Protected By the First Amendment?
Wikileaks Cablegate: Time to Blame the Victim? →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • DOJ investigates ex-ransomware negotiator over extortion kickbacks
  • Hackers Using PDFs to Impersonate Microsoft, DocuSign, and More in Callback Phishing Campaigns
  • One in Five Law Firms Hit by Cyberattacks Over Past 12 Months
  • U.S. Sanctions Russian Bulletproof Hosting Provider for Supporting Cybercriminals Behind Ransomware
  • Senator Chides FBI for Weak Advice on Mobile Security
  • Cl0p cybercrime gang’s data exfiltration tool found vulnerable to RCE attacks
  • Kelly Benefits updates its 2024 data breach report: impacts 550,000 customers
  • Qantas customers involved in mammoth data breach
  • CMS Sending Letters to 103,000 Medicare beneficiaries whose info was involved in a Medicare.gov breach.
  • Esse Health provides update about April cyberattack and notifies 263,601 people (1)

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Oregon Amends Its Comprehensive Privacy Statute
  • Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Liberal Majority Strikes Down 176-Year-Old Abortion Ban
  • 20 States Sue HHS to Stop Medicaid Data Sharing with ICE
  • Kids are making deepfakes of each other, and laws aren’t keeping up
  • The Trump administration is building a national citizenship data system
  • Supreme Court Decision on Age Verification Tramples Free Speech and Undermines Privacy
  • New Jersey Issues Draft Privacy Regulations: The New

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.