DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

CHINA: first 100 days of Cybersecurity Law sees active enforcement and more guidelines, but still uncertainties

Posted on September 4, 2017 by Dissent

Carolyn Bigg of DLA Piper writes:

Almost 100 days have passed since the new PRC Cybersecurity Law came into force. While the enforcement environment is becoming clearer – and shows data protection and cyber security in China is a real risk to be taken seriously – most of the new guidelines published to try to add meat to the bones of the new law are unfortunately still in draft; and there are still major uncertainties around who is a KIIO, and how and when network operators can transfer data overseas.

Key developments over the Summer include:

• Actual enforcement action: as widely reported in the press, there has been a flurry of enforcement activity by the CAC under the new Cybersecurity Law, including very high profile investigations into some of the biggest online platforms in China, as well as enforcement notices being issued at a local level. This has been alongside the ongoing crackdown on illegal VPN use, meaning a very busy Summer for the regulators. It reinforces our predictions that the combination of an organised, proactive regulator – alongside greater regulatory engagement through assessment, certification and whistleblowing mechanisms in the new law – means the enforcement risk in China is now much higher, and the new law cannot be ignored.

• Draft KIIO regulations: the CAC published for consultation its draft Regulations on Protection of Critical Information Infrastructure Security on 10 July 2017. Some of the key draft proposals include:

Read more on Privacy Matters. 

In developments elsewhere, Mark Young of Covington & Burling writes that the UK government is  proposing a cybersecurity law with serious fines. A published consultation The consultation

includes a proposal to fine firms that fail to implement “appropriate and proportionate security measures” up to EUR 20 million or 4% of global turnover (whichever is greater).

Read more on InsidePrivacy.

Wondering how our own cybersecurity is progressing? I found it outrageous that President Trump recently congratulated Finland on its cybersecurity program and suggested that we would be right up there with them soon when the reality is that more than 1/4 of President Trump’s advisors recently resigned en masse, citing, in part, the President’s lack of attention to serious national security matters involving cybersecurity. Gah…..


Related:

  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Toys “R” Us Canada customers notified of breach of personal information
  • Gatineau gymnastics centre warns members of possible data breach
  • Data breach in 42 Latvian municipalities: DVI imposes 300,000 euro fine on ZZ Dats
  • Confidence in ransomware recovery is high but actual success rates remain low
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesFederalNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← Thousands of Security Firm Job Applications Citing Top Secret US Government Work Exposed on Misconfigured Amazon Server
Edmonton Police Seize Fazny.ca For Stealing Users’ Card Data →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says
  • The Case for Making EdTech Companies Liable Under FERPA
  • NHS providers reviewing stolen Synnovis data published by cyber criminals

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.