DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Way to risk those lawsuits, U. Iowa!

Posted on March 17, 2011 by Dissent

Having your employees find out that you are monitoring them surreptitiously doesn’t make for happy employees and may lead to legal problems in terms of surveillance laws and labor laws.

Having a patient privacy incident can be infinitely worse.

Managing to risk combining both can be a nightmare.

But that’s somewhat what happened recently in Iowa after a supervisor at University of Iowa attempted to surreptitiously monitor employees.  The Associated Press reports:

Top University of Iowa medical officials told employees Wednesday they regretted a supervisor’s attempted use of a hidden baby monitor to determine whether secretaries were talking too much, but they claimed the device did not pick up any conversations or violate medical privacy law.

U of I Vice President for Medical Affairs Jean Robillard and Associate Vice President for Health Care Human Resources Jana Wessels said an internal investigation was continuing but had already determined “no conversations were transmitted” before the device was discovered in a department of urology clinic Monday and promptly removed.

Read more in the Des Moines Register.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Mailing error exposes over 3,000 cancer patients' names to each other
(update) UK: University inquiry as students’ personal details leaked online →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ransomware group Gunra claims to have exfiltrated 450 million patient records from American Hospital Dubai.
  • North Shore University Sleep Disorders Center employee charged with secretly recording patients in restrooms
  • When ransomware listings create confusion as to who the victim was
  • Rajkot civic body’s GIS website hit by cyber attack, over 400 GB data feared stolen
  • Taiwan’s BitoPro hit by NT$345 million cryptocurrency hack
  • Texas gastroenterology and surgical practice victim of ransomware attack
  • Romanian Citizen Pleads Guilty to ‘Swatting’ Numerous Members of Congress, Churches, and Former U.S. President
  • North Dakota Enacts Financial Data Security and Data Breach Notification Requirements
  • Pro-Ukraine hacker group Black Owl poses ‘major threat’ to Russia, Kaspersky says
  • Vanta bug exposed customers’ data to other customers

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Florida ban on kids using social media likely unconstitutional, judge rules
  • State Data Minimization Laws Spark Compliance Uncertainty
  • Supreme Court Agrees to Clarify Emergency Situations Where Police Don’t Need Warrant
  • Stewart Baker vs. Orin Kerr on “The Digital Fourth Amendment”
  • Fears Grow Over ICE’s Reach Into Schools
  • Resource: HoganLovells Asia-Pacific Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Guide 2025
  • She Got an Abortion. So A Texas Cop Used 83,000 Cameras to Track Her Down.

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.