DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Signify Health notifies covered entities’ patients of possible access to their PHI

Posted on April 9, 2021 by Dissent

Signify Health, LLC is a business associate to entities covered under HIPAA.  On October 12, 2020, they discovered that an employee had published his login credentials to a subscription-based job board. The employee, described as a low-level IT Support Specialist, was seeking a coding specialist to help him write a job-related script. He would later claim that he did not realize he had uploaded his login credentials.

From a notification to New Hampshire by Signify’s external counsel:

Signify did not know, consent to, or condone this action; moreover, the employee violated Signify’s established policy and Code of Conduct. Signify has since terminated this employee.

The good news (if there was good news) is that the employee’s job was to receive, log, triage , and track IT support requests in Jira. His login credentials only gave him access to Jira. The other good news was that Signify learned of the exposed credentials in approximately three hours.

The bad news was that every ticket in the Jira support ticket system had to be manually checked to determine whether it contained any protected health information:

To discover any Protected Data, a user must manually open each ticket to determine whether the ticket contains any attachments. If it does, the user must then click on the attachment to determine whether it contains Protected Data.

Despite Kroll’s efforts, they could neither prove nor rule out unauthorized access to any PHI attached to tickets. Those notified were offered identity monitory and credit restoration services through Kroll.

So for a three-hour window of exposure, I wonder what this now-former employee’s mistake cost Signify in terms of incident response.  As a result of the incident, they have made several changes, including implementing two-factor authentication for all its technology systems.

Note that their report to New Hampshire and to patients was in March, and since we have not seen anything from Signify on HHS’s public breach tool, we may not see this one on that list.


Related:

  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Gatineau gymnastics centre warns members of possible data breach
  • Data breach in 42 Latvian municipalities: DVI imposes 300,000 euro fine on ZZ Dats
  • Resource: NY DFS Issues New Cybersecurity Guidance to Address Risks Associated with the Use of Third-Party Service Providers
  • KT Chief to Resign After Cybersecurity Breach Resolution
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
Category: Breach IncidentsInsiderSubcontractor

Post navigation

← Maze/Egregor ransomware cartel estimated to have made $75 million
Fr: City of Isle-sur-la-Sorgue victim of ransomware; won’t pay €500,000 demand →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others
  • Draft UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill Enters UK Parliament
  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Maryland Privacy Crackdown Raises Bar for Disclosure Compliance
  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.