DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Gonzalez sentencing memo reveals some numbers on breaches

Posted on December 19, 2009 by Dissent

Apart from the fact that I don’t think we should be getting our news about breaches from court filings years after a breach occurs, it is still somewhat interesting when we finally get some numbers — even if they are are estimates or arguable.

In a court filing by Albert Gonzalez’s attorney yesterday, there are references to the pre-sentencing report (PSR):

The PSR states that of the 36 million card numbers obtained from TJX, at least 25 million — approximately 70% — were expired, PSR ¶35, and therefor unusable.

36 million?  Not 45 million or 94 million?  Hmmmm…

… the PSR states that defendants obtained account information for 5,132 cards through the Dave & Buster’s intrusion, but only 675 cards — about 13% — were ever used. PSR ¶26. The government also, with one exception, has not attempted to quantify the number of cards as to which the information was actually sold. The one exception is the statement in the PSR that codefendant Scott estimated that 300,000 to 400,000 credit card numbers obtained from BJ’s Wholesale Club were sold. PSR ¶31…. Gonzalez has testified the reliability of Scott’s estimate.

The PSR also provided estimates of losses due to breaches:

As for actual loss, the PSR lists the following:  “TJX, more than $180.5 million in losses and associated expenses” (later changed to $171.5 million, itself a reflection of guesswork), DSW, $6.5 million to $9.5 million; BJ’s, $11 million to $13 million;  Dave & Busters, $720,288.

I’ve uploaded the memorandum for those who wish to read more of the references to the government’s report,  here.  The numbers begin on page 11 of the memorandum.


Related:

  • UN Cybercrime Convention to be signed in Hanoi to tackle global offences
  • Bombay High Court Orders Department of Telecommunications to Block Medusa Accounts After Generali Insurance Data Breach
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • John Bolton Indictment Provides Interesting Details About Hack of His AOL Account and Extortion Attempt
  • UK: 'Catastrophic' attack as Russians hack files on EIGHT MoD bases and post them on the dark web
  • The Alliance That Wasn’t: A Critical Analysis of ReliaQuest’s Q3 2025 Ransomware Report
Category: Of Note

Post navigation

← UK: Shropshire Council found in breach of the Data Protection Act
B.C. civil servant accused of sending personal data to U.S. border guard →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says
  • The Case for Making EdTech Companies Liable Under FERPA
  • NHS providers reviewing stolen Synnovis data published by cyber criminals

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.