DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

UK: DNA pioneer: Innocents should be removed from database

Posted on April 15, 2009 by Dissent

Rebecca Thomson reports:

A leading DNA scientist whose work led to the creation of the DNA database has called for innocent people to be removed from it.

Alec Jeffreys, the inventor of genetic fingerprinting, says forcing innocent people to remain on the database will erode public support for the project.

Currently anyone who is arrested is added to the database, whether or not they go on to be convicted. It now has 5 million people on it.

Read more on ComputerWeekly.com

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Australian Government Set To Strip Privacy Protection From Patient Records
UK: NHS trusts not allowed to seek alternative patient record systems →

1 thought on “UK: DNA pioneer: Innocents should be removed from database”

  1. Anonymous says:
    April 15, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    I think the bigger question with all of these database is… is any of the information in them credible.

    With products like DNA Identiguard it is relatively trivial to hide your genetic identity from genetic testing and DNA fingerprinting altogether.

    I won’t be surprised if there were wrongful convictions based solely on DNA evidence. And I am not saying the science of DNA fingerprinting is wrong, but rather these tests are done by humans who make mistakes (mislabel tubes, mislabel experiments, do not run proper positive and negative controls, etc.)

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Episource notifying 5.4 million patients of cyberattack in January
  • Investigation of 2024 Helsinki data breach – Report
  • Major trial underway for data leak that left 72,000 victims in France
  • Anubis: A Closer Look at an Emerging Ransomware with Built-in Wiper
  • HealthEC Agrees to $5.48 Million Settlement to End Data Breach Lawsuit
  • US offering $10 million for info on Iranian hackers behind IOControl malware
  • Sompo Japan Insurance submits improvement plan after info leakage
  • Moreno Valley, Calif., Schools Report Data Breach
  • The Growing Cyber Risks from AI — and How Organizations Can Fight Back
  • UPDATING: Credit Control Corporation denies any current breach

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data
  • DOJ Seeks More Time on Tower Dumps
  • Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer
  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report