DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Security breach in April 2010 reported to affected Purdue U. math students in 2011

Posted on August 16, 2011 by Dissent

If you’ve taken a math class at Purdue, your security could be at risk.

Purdue University (PU) said 7,093 former students and faculty who took part in a math course could be at risk.

University officials said an unauthorized person broke into their computer system on April 5, 2010, and tried to use the server to attack other servers.

Purdue University staff learned of the breach three days after it happened and immediately took the server off-line.

PU staff said there was no evidence the intruder accessed files, but there was personal information files available dating back to 2000 through the summer session of 2005, which had been placed on the computer in error.

Read more on WFLI.

Yes, the story says 2010 and that they learned of the breach three days later. So why is this announcement being made in 2011? A statement on Purdue’s site dated today explains:

Purdue University is informing 7,093 former students who took mathematics courses, faculty and some others that an unauthorized user may have gained access to information about them. Those affected have been notified by personal letter.

The breach occurred on April 5, 2010. Purdue staff learned of the breach three days later and immediately took the server off line. Although the intruder left no evidence of seeking or accessing the files, there were files with personal information present – mainly older course records from 2000 through the summer session of 2005 – that had been placed on the computer in error.

Examination of the breach indicated its characteristics were not consistent with an attack designed to gather data from the system, but rather an attempt to use the system to launch attacks against other servers.

However, Purdue staff conducted an in-depth and time-intensive forensic examination to determine what types of data might have been exposed during the breach. The scan of the system determined there were 6.6 million nine-digit numbers found in files created by 286 different users. Establishing which numbers could be actual Social Security numbers required individual examinations of the context of each number with the file owners and took six months to accomplish. That left 64,268 numbers that could still have been Social Security numbers, and an additional four months was needed to refine the scanning techniques, employ additional forensics and determine the actual number of Social Security numbers was 7,093.

The team then matched the numbers to their owners and informed the Indiana Attorney General’s office in late June 2011. The math department was then able to notify the owners of the numbers.

“Through our investigation, we found no evidence that the unauthorized user attempted to find or read any files with personal information in our system, but felt informing people who may have been affected was a necessary precaution,” said Laszlo Lempert, head of the Department of Mathematics. “We regret the breach occurred, and we’ve taken extensive measures to prevent this from happening again.”

In addition to former students, a small number of faculty, family members and contractors also have been informed that they were potentially affected. The notification letter provides a toll-free phone number for inquiries at 866-520-0492.

Under university policy, Social Security numbers are no longer used except where required by law. Instead, all students, alumni, faculty and staff, and others whose records are kept for business reasons are assigned a Purdue identification number.

[….]

So what do you think? Should the examination have taken 10 months or is this an unacceptable delay? And does the Indiana Attorney General’s Office think this was an excusable delay?


Related:

  • KT Chief to Resign After Cybersecurity Breach Resolution
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • Hackers Say They Have Personal Data of Thousands of NSA and Other Government Officials
  • UK: 'Catastrophic' attack as Russians hack files on EIGHT MoD bases and post them on the dark web
Category: Breach IncidentsEducation SectorHackU.S.

Post navigation

← Ebay hacked by @cslsec, info leaks to come soon
Update on Gallatin, TN card fraud →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.