DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Panda Security Claims Leaked Data was Fake Emails and Non Valid Accounts

Posted on March 8, 2012 by Lee J

Yesterday, Panda Security was hacked, defaced and had a bunch of data leaked by Anonymous hackers flying the LulzSec flag. Tghe attack which is said to of happened due to claims that panda worked with fbi to help bring down certain people that have been involved in recent attacks. Not long after the attack Panda Security announced a short press release on their Facebook page that makes some strong claims that the hackers didn’t get very far and didn’t even deface the main site’s.

Panda Security On March 6th the hacking group LulzSec, part of Anonymous, obtained access to a Panda Security webserver hosted outside of the Panda Security internal network. This server was used only for marketing campaigns and to host some of the company’s blogs. Neither the main website www.pandasecurity.com norwww.cloudantivirus.com were affected in the attack. The attack did not breach Panda Security’s internal network and neither source code, update servers nor customer data was accessed. The only information accessed was related to marketing campaigns such as landing pages and some obsolete credentials, including supposed credentials for employees that have not been working at Panda for over five years. We continue investigating the cause of the intrusion and will provide more details as soon as they become available. Meanwhile we assure all our customers and partners that none of their information has been compromised and that our products and services continue functioning as normal.

As a response to this press release there have been the typical taunts from anonymous supporters that we have seen in the past from the stratfor attacks. Surprisingly they have been fair vocal in the response’s to some questions people are asking with answers like " Hi David, we are pretty sure that the info of our customers or products have not been compromised. The info published about passwords are no longer valid, but not only passwords, but also e-mail addresses are fake. Anyway, and this is not an excuse, nobody is safe. Bigger companies have also suffered from attacks like this. Back in 2010 some other groups tried to attacks Panda as well." So as you can see Panda is claiming the emails were fake and the accounts was no longer active, is this true? its really anyone’s guess unless some one comes forward with further proof. Read panda’s release here

Related posts:

  • LulzSec the time line, history, information links, images videos and haters
  • Operation Anti Security Breakdown and targets, the full time line
  • #Anonymous set sights on F1 second year in a row for #OpBahrain
  • Who is on TEKsystems Intel Leak
Category: Breach Incidents

Post navigation

← Everything’s leaking everywhere: McGill shuts down website that revealed donor records
Anonymous Leak Symantec Norton AntiVirus 2006 in the name of #FreeHammond →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Horizon Healthcare RCM discloses ransomware attack in December
  • Disgruntled IT Worker Jailed for Cyber Attack, Huddersfield
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Texas Centers for Infectious Disease Associates Notifies Individuals of Data Breach in 2024
  • Battlefords Union Hospitals notifies patients of employee snooping in their records
  • Alert: Scattered Spider has added North American airline and transportation organizations to their target list
  • Northern Light Health patients affected by security incident at Compumedics; 10 healthcare entities affected
  • Privacy commissioner reviewing reported Ontario Health atHome data breach
  • CMS warns Medicare providers of fraud scheme
  • Ex-student charged with wave of cyber attacks on Sydney uni

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Supreme Court Decision on Age Verification Tramples Free Speech and Undermines Privacy
  • New Jersey Issues Draft Privacy Regulations: The New
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina
  • European Commission publishes its plan to enable more effective law enforcement access to data

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.