DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Korn/Ferry breach details emerge

Posted on October 12, 2012 by Dissent

Thanks to the California Attorney General’s Office, we now have some of the details on the Korn/Ferry breach, reported yesterday on this blog. Korn/Ferry is an executive recruiting firm.

In their sample notification, Thom Steinoff, CTO, writes:

We are writing to inform you about a recent incident involving our data network. We recently learned that we were the victim of a sophisticated cyber attack. We deeply regret that this incident occurred and take very seriously the security of our network.

But when did this “recent” incident occur? They don’t say at this point, but they indicate later that it may have gone on for months before they learned of it in August.

We began investigating the incident as soon as we learned of it.

How did they learn of it? They don’t say. And why did it take them months to learn of it? They don’t tell us that, either.

While our investigation is ongoing, we have determined that, although the affected databases were not designed or structured to receive sensitive personal information, a small percentage of the files nevertheless included an individual’s name in combination with his or her driver’s license number, government-issued identification number, Social Security number, credit card numbers or health information. It is important to note that we have no evidence that access to personal information was the goal of the attack.

Korn/Ferry has already taken a number of steps to enhance the security of the relevant computer network. In addition to these steps, we have been working with law enforcement in connection with their investigation of the incident. Korn/Ferry quickly secured its network against the attack, which appears to have been underway for a number of months, shortly after discovering it in August 2012. Korn/Ferry was asked by federal law enforcement officials, however, to delay disclosure of the existence of the attack until now.

Emphasis in the above added by me.

You can read the full letter here, which includes an offer of free credit monitoring protection.

In light of this explanation, their press release yesterday is even more problematic as their statement, “The databases that were impacted are not designed or structured to collect credit card, payment card, bank account, social security numbers, government identification numbers or health information. ” might  have been interpreted by some to mean that those types of data were not in the impacted databases. To the contrary, while the databases were not supposed to have such data, they apparently did.

Korn/Ferry did not indicate how many clients or candidates were affected by this incident.

Category: Breach IncidentsBusiness SectorHackU.S.

Post navigation

← NJ: Credit card info of more than 100 customers stolen from North Bergen car transport business
Former University of Maryland Medical Center employee sentenced for role in ID theft scheme →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Australian national known as “DR32” sentenced in U.S. federal court
  • Alabama Man Sentenced to 14 Months in Connection with Securities and Exchange Commission X Hack that Spiked Bitcoin Prices
  • Japan enacts new Active Cyberdefense Law allowing for offensive cyber operations
  • Breachforums Boss “Pompompurin” to Pay $700k in Healthcare Breach
  • HHS Office for Civil Rights Settles HIPAA Cybersecurity Investigation with Vision Upright MRI
  • Additional 12 Defendants Charged in RICO Conspiracy for over $263 Million Cryptocurrency Thefts, Money Laundering, Home Break-Ins
  • RIBridges firewall worked. But forensic report says hundreds of alarms went unnoticed by Deloitte.
  • Chinese Hackers Hit Drone Sector in Supply Chain Attacks
  • Coinbase says hackers bribed staff to steal customer data and are demanding $20 million ransom
  • $28 million in Texas’ cybersecurity funding for schools left unspent

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Privacy enforcement under Andrew Ferguson’s FTC
  • “We would be less confidential than Google” – Proton threatens to quit Switzerland over new surveillance law
  • CFPB Quietly Kills Rule to Shield Americans From Data Brokers
  • South Korea fines Temu for data protection violations
  • The BR Privacy & Security Download: May 2025
  • License Plate Reader Company Flock Is Building a Massive People Lookup Tool, Leak Shows
  • FTC dismisses privacy concerns in Google breakup

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.