DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Florida Department of State confirms data breach

Posted on March 31, 2015 by Dissent

Florida’s Department of State has now issued a press release about a breach first reported on this site yesterday. Here’s their statement:

The Florida Division of Elections has learned of the inadvertent release of non-confidential voter information that occurred in March following the fulfillment of voter registration record extract requests.

The Division of Elections has confirmed that only non-confidential information was released in the data breach. Confidential information such as social security numbers was not released in the data breach.

The incident involved the inclusion of non-confidential information for high-risk professionals. Although voter registration records are public under Florida Public Records law, individuals designated as high-risk professionals are allowed exemption from having some personal contact information made public.

The Florida Division of Elections has already provided written notice to the recipients of 15 CDs containing the exempt information with instructions to disregard, destroy and/or return the information. The division is also in the process of notifying the affected individuals whose information was inadvertently released.

While the incident is still being investigated, it has been determined that the release of the non-confidential information was due to a malfunction in the automated software used to process record extract requests and the department is taking action to prevent future occurrences.

Affected individuals are unlikely to be impacted. However, if any fraud, threats or harassment believed to be connected to this incident occur, individuals are encouraged to report such incidents to local law enforcement.

PUBLIC RECORD EXEMPTION FOR HIGH-RISK PROFESSIONALS

Voter registration records are public under Florida Public Records law. This means non-confidential information such as a voter’s name, date of birth, address, phone number, and email address are public. The only information that is confidential and exempt under all circumstances are driver’s licenses, state identification cards, and social security numbers.

However, the law does allow select group of high-risk professionals to request an exemption for non-confidential information. Individuals designated as high-risk professionals include, but are not limited to, law enforcement officials, judges and high-level state officials. The professional must make the request in writing to each agency that may have the information in its public records.

A spokesperson for the state informs DataBreaches.net that they are sending individual notification letters this week to 45,173 individuals.

A description of the high-risk categories who can request exemption from disclosure of non-confidential information is provided in this form (h/t, flvoters.com)


Related:

  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
  • KT Chief to Resign After Cybersecurity Breach Resolution
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • Romanian prisoner hacks prison IT system in plot made for a Netflix movie
  • John Bolton Indictment Provides Interesting Details About Hack of His AOL Account and Extortion Attempt
  • A business's cyber insurance policy included ransom coverage, but when they needed it, the insurer refused to pay. Why?
Category: Breach IncidentsExposureGovernment Sector

Post navigation

← Zappos data breach settlement falls apart over attorneys’ fees
More details on the French Lick Resort payment card breach →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.