DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Yet more data from the Sea Mar Community Health Center data breach appears on the internet

Posted on March 9, 2022 by Dissent

If Herman’s Hermits sang about the latest development in the Sea Mar Community Health Center data breach, they’d probably sing:

Third verse, same as the first
A little bit louder and a whole lot worse


Last month, DataBreaches.net reported that Sea Mar Community Health Center in Washington state had been sued in November, weeks after they disclosed a data breach that they had first become aware of in June, 2021. Because the lawsuits were filed in November, the complaints filed mentioned some data had shown up on the dark web. A lot more would show up later, however, and not just on the dark web.

By February, data from Sea Mar had been dumped twice on both the dark web and clear net: some data was dumped by the Marketo group in June, 2021, to entice people to buy or bid on what they claimed was 3 TB of data. Then in January, Snatch Team dumped 22 GB of data from “Private Company #1” that appeared to be Sea Mar’s data. As this site reported, the data dump included a variety of file types and information. As DataBreaches.net reported at the time, “One file alone contained more than 160,000 individuals’ name, date of birth, and SSN. Other files contained their addresses and telephone numbers.”  The data were freely available to whoever wanted to download it on both the dark web and on clear net.

As in past attempts to alert them and to get a response from them, Sea Mar did not respond to notification by, or queries by, DataBreaches.net about the 22 GB data dump. This site also alerted the Washington Attorney General’s Office because of the now-increased risk to patients and employees.

But there was more to come, it seems. Snatch Team recently listed “Private Company #2” on its site, and dumped more than 160 GB of data.

Snatch Team listing for “Private Company #2” contains 651,408 photo files. Image: DataBreaches.net

How many of those image files are employees’ drivers’ licenses and how many may be patient-related drivers’ licenses is unknown to DataBreaches.net, but while some of the files are quite old and licenses would be expired, other files are newer. Unlike the 22 GB dump, this newer dump contained only photo IDs like driver’s licenses, but there were more than 650,000 of such files.

As it did with “Private Company #1,” Snatch Team would not confirm that the data were from Sea Mar. In a chat, a spokesperson for Snatch Team informed DataBreaches.net that not all dumps on their site were their work and others posting data to their site did not always indicate the source. In their own words:

We are not a state project. We do not belong to any country, either in whole or in part. We are international, anyone who is registered on our portal can post information about the hacked company. Something we hack ourselves, something is published by our users. Our business model probably simply does not exist, the world is so globalized that to destroy it, missiles or aircraft are no longer needed, but a group of people with certain skills and hacker attacks on critical infrastructure are enough. And our goal is to draw people’s attention to this problem, because those who are responsible for security are absolutely unwilling to recognize the fact that security around the world, information security is 0. As for the Sea Mar campaign, we cannot name it due to the fact that the person who posted it did not indicate the source of the data leak.

But one thing is clear by now: data with PII and PHI of Sea Mar employees and patients has already been leaked on both the dark web and clear net, increasing the risk of misuse. To this site’s knowledge, there has been no updated notice by Sea Mar to alert people to the January and March data dumps with so much information.

Once again, DataBreaches.net reached out to Sea Mar to alert them to this newest leak and to ask them if they had ever notified employees and patients that their information was being shared widely on the internet.

Once again, no reply was received.

Plaintiff’s counsel were asked if they had any comment on the newest leak, but they, too, did not reply.


Related:

  • Hacking Formula 1: Accessing Max Verstappen's passport and PII through FIA bugs
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • Resource: NY DFS Issues New Cybersecurity Guidance to Address Risks Associated with the Use of Third-Party Service Providers
  • Hotel and Casino near Las Vegas Strip suffers data breach, documents say
  • Bombay High Court Orders Department of Telecommunications to Block Medusa Accounts After Generali Insurance Data Breach
  • KT Chief to Resign After Cybersecurity Breach Resolution
Category: Breach IncidentsCommentaries and AnalysesHackHealth Data

Post navigation

← Sodinokibi/REvil Ransomware Defendant Extradited to United States and Arraigned in Texas
Unable to determine what files were accessed, Norwood Clinic notifies all 228,103 patients →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.