DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Yet more data from the Sea Mar Community Health Center data breach appears on the internet

Posted on March 9, 2022 by Dissent

If Herman’s Hermits sang about the latest development in the Sea Mar Community Health Center data breach, they’d probably sing:

Third verse, same as the first
A little bit louder and a whole lot worse


Last month, DataBreaches.net reported that Sea Mar Community Health Center in Washington state had been sued in November, weeks after they disclosed a data breach that they had first become aware of in June, 2021. Because the lawsuits were filed in November, the complaints filed mentioned some data had shown up on the dark web. A lot more would show up later, however, and not just on the dark web.

By February, data from Sea Mar had been dumped twice on both the dark web and clear net: some data was dumped by the Marketo group in June, 2021, to entice people to buy or bid on what they claimed was 3 TB of data. Then in January, Snatch Team dumped 22 GB of data from “Private Company #1” that appeared to be Sea Mar’s data. As this site reported, the data dump included a variety of file types and information. As DataBreaches.net reported at the time, “One file alone contained more than 160,000 individuals’ name, date of birth, and SSN. Other files contained their addresses and telephone numbers.”  The data were freely available to whoever wanted to download it on both the dark web and on clear net.

As in past attempts to alert them and to get a response from them, Sea Mar did not respond to notification by, or queries by, DataBreaches.net about the 22 GB data dump. This site also alerted the Washington Attorney General’s Office because of the now-increased risk to patients and employees.

But there was more to come, it seems. Snatch Team recently listed “Private Company #2” on its site, and dumped more than 160 GB of data.

Snatch Team listing for “Private Company #2” contains 651,408 photo files. Image: DataBreaches.net

How many of those image files are employees’ drivers’ licenses and how many may be patient-related drivers’ licenses is unknown to DataBreaches.net, but while some of the files are quite old and licenses would be expired, other files are newer. Unlike the 22 GB dump, this newer dump contained only photo IDs like driver’s licenses, but there were more than 650,000 of such files.

As it did with “Private Company #1,” Snatch Team would not confirm that the data were from Sea Mar. In a chat, a spokesperson for Snatch Team informed DataBreaches.net that not all dumps on their site were their work and others posting data to their site did not always indicate the source. In their own words:

We are not a state project. We do not belong to any country, either in whole or in part. We are international, anyone who is registered on our portal can post information about the hacked company. Something we hack ourselves, something is published by our users. Our business model probably simply does not exist, the world is so globalized that to destroy it, missiles or aircraft are no longer needed, but a group of people with certain skills and hacker attacks on critical infrastructure are enough. And our goal is to draw people’s attention to this problem, because those who are responsible for security are absolutely unwilling to recognize the fact that security around the world, information security is 0. As for the Sea Mar campaign, we cannot name it due to the fact that the person who posted it did not indicate the source of the data leak.

But one thing is clear by now: data with PII and PHI of Sea Mar employees and patients has already been leaked on both the dark web and clear net, increasing the risk of misuse. To this site’s knowledge, there has been no updated notice by Sea Mar to alert people to the January and March data dumps with so much information.

Once again, DataBreaches.net reached out to Sea Mar to alert them to this newest leak and to ask them if they had ever notified employees and patients that their information was being shared widely on the internet.

Once again, no reply was received.

Plaintiff’s counsel were asked if they had any comment on the newest leak, but they, too, did not reply.

Category: Breach IncidentsCommentaries and AnalysesHackHealth Data

Post navigation

← Sodinokibi/REvil Ransomware Defendant Extradited to United States and Arraigned in Texas
Unable to determine what files were accessed, Norwood Clinic notifies all 228,103 patients →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • International cybercrime tackled: Amsterdam police and FBI dismantle proxy service Anyproxy
  • Moldovan Police Arrest Suspect in €4.5M Ransomware Attack on Dutch Research Agency
  • N.W.T.’s medical record system under the microscope after 2 reported cases of snooping
  • Department of Justice says Berkeley Research Group data breach may have exposed information on diocesan sex abuse survivors
  • Masimo Manufacturing Facilities Hit by Cyberattack
  • Education giant Pearson hit by cyberattack exposing customer data
  • Star Health hacker claims sending bullets, threats to top executives: Reports
  • Nova Scotia Power hit by cyberattack, critical infrastructure targeted, no outages reported
  • Georgia hospital defeats data-tracking lawsuit
  • 60K BTC Wallets Tied to LockBit Ransomware Gang Leaked

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • FTC dismisses privacy concerns in Google breakup
  • ARC sells airline ticket records to ICE and others
  • Clothing Retailer, Todd Snyder, Inc., Settles CPPA Allegations Regarding California Consumer Privacy Act Violations
  • US Customs and Border Protection Plans to Photograph Everyone Exiting the US by Car
  • Google agrees to pay Texas $1.4 billion data privacy settlement
  • The App Store Freedom Act Compromises User Privacy To Punish Big Tech
  • Florida bill requiring encryption backdoors for social media accounts has failed

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.