DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Everything old is new again… or did it just never stop? (1)

Posted on March 21, 2023 by Dissent

In June 2022, Christopher Cook reached out to IPFS:

Hi @IPFS if someone sends a phishing email with an link to IPSF.io (sic) is that something that needs to be reported to your abuse team? If so, this is their link which is phishing for cpanel logins https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmatpCGs1h4jCwAWcbUEFMMLrLjYi1Po3o29JWcCVxfszx

— Christopher Cook (@webprofusion) June 7, 2022

That link is now gone, but at the time, @[email protected] replied to Cook:

Thanks for reporting this 🙏🏼 I’ve passed it along. Yes, you can email [email protected] with anything like this.

— @[email protected] (@dietrich) June 14, 2022

Months later, @CEOemail commented:

ipfs abuse is becoming a big problem.

Why aren’t you doing proper due diligence on potential customers *before* allowing them to use your platform?

— CEOemail ✉ – Marcus Williamson (@CEOemail) October 14, 2022

There was no reply to that.

Today, DataBreaches received an email addressed to the administrator account.   The content was typical of phishing attempts in that it threatened a cutoff date for email services and provided a link to click to verify my identity in case they had made a mistake.

Somewhat amusingly, the “From” line in the email showed the sender as “Admin”<[email protected]>.

But if clicked, the validation link would have taken me to a url on IPFS.io. The url did not point to the exact same url that Cook reported last June, but the url pointed to the same directory as Cook had reported: https://ipfs.io/ipfs/

DataBreaches has sent an email to [email protected]:

Hi. I know IPFS was made aware of this security issue last June (a
thread on Twitter confirms that), but your domain appears to still be
used for phishing attacks. See forward below and attached for
screencap of email body.

The phishing link points to:
https://ipfs.io/ipfs/[redacted]

And please explain to me why the threat actors are still able to
misuse your domain.

Thank you.

DataBreaches awaits their reply.

Update March 22. IPFS.io has not replied, and two more phishing attempts have been received. These appear to be from DocuSign:

Phishing attempt appears to be from DocuSign but redirects to an IPFS.io link.


Related:

  • KT Chief to Resign After Cybersecurity Breach Resolution
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • A business's cyber insurance policy included ransom coverage, but when they needed it, the insurer refused to pay. Why?
  • Before Their Telegram Channel Was Banned Again, ScatteredLAPSUS$Hunters Dropped Files Doxing Government Employees (2)
  • Attorney General James Secures $14.2 Million from Car Insurance Companies Over Data Breaches
  • Months After Being Notified, a Software Vendor is Still Exposing Confidential and Sealed Court Records
Category: Breach Incidents

Post navigation

← BreachForums down, and will not be back
Has Oakland been hit with a second ransomware attack? (1) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.