DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Benworth Capital Partners negotiated with threat actors after more than 25,000 lenders had data stolen

Posted on November 7, 2025 by Dissent

Benworth Capital Partners PR LLC  is a licensed lender in Florida that describes itself as a “hard money lender.” Benworth claims they make the decisions to fund hard money loans “based on our unique criteria that’s a lot different than a bank, credit union, or mainstream online lender. The funds used for our hard money loans are from private investors who believe in the potential of real estate as much as we do. We consider three main factors when making a loan decision:

  • The borrower’s ability to repay the loan, primarily income earned from employment.
  • The value of the property.
  • The borrower’s equity in the property. For a purchase, this means the downpayment amount. For a refinance equity is the value of the property less the balance in a current mortgage.

On September 16, Benworth Capital (“Benworth”) sent notification letters to those affected by a cybersecurity incident that occurred on or about May 18, 2025.  Benworth’s letter states that they believe the incident happened when a criminal actor accessed certain components of their systems through an unnamed third-party service provider.

Benworth negotiated with the unnamed threat actors for the return and deletion of the stolen files and has been monitoring the dark web and other sources. As of their September 16 letter, they found no indication that any of the data or information had been disseminated.

The affected files included loan-related information such as borrower name (which may be an individual or a business name), address, the taxpayer identification number provided (which may be an employer identification number or Social Security number), phone number, loan account number, maturity date, closing date, and loan amount.

Benworth states that in response to the breach, they have worked diligently to address the vulnerability and establish a high level of confidence that the threat has been contained and that system security has been restored.

“As part of our ongoing commitment to information security, we continue to look for ways to improve our processes and procedures, both internally and with respect to our service providers, and to evaluate and, when appropriate, implement additional measures to protect against this type of incident in the future,” they state.  In addition, they offered those affected identity theft protection services of IDX.

A copy of Benworth’s letter was submitted to the California Attorney General’s Office on October 31.

As of today, no group has publicly claimed responsibility for the attack or leaked any of the data.

Although the total number of individuals affected by this incident has not been publicly disclosed, 943 Oregon residents, 22,895 Texas residents, and 1,230 Massachusetts residents were reportedly affected.

Category: Financial SectorHackSubcontractorU.S.

Post navigation

← Android Hit by 0-Click RCE Vulnerability in Core System Component
Breaking Up With Edtech Is Hard to Do →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says
  • The Case for Making EdTech Companies Liable Under FERPA
  • NHS providers reviewing stolen Synnovis data published by cyber criminals

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.