DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Rehoboth McKinley Christian Health Care Services settles data breach litigation for undisclosed amount

Posted on February 22, 2023 by Dissent

Rehoboth Mckinley Christian Health Care Services (“RMCHCS”) in New Mexico has reportedly settled litigation stemming from a ransomware attack that DataBreaches first reported in February 2021. Although Conti ransomware threat actors had added the health care service to their leak site and leaked some patients’ protected health information as proof of claims, there was nothing disclosed by RMCHCS at the time.

On May 19, the service posted a notice on its website and notified 209,280 patients. Their notification did not address whether they had paid any ransom or not.

According to the settlement terms reported by Top Class Actions, RMCHCS admits no wrongdoing. No total settlement amount has been disclosed. Class members can receive up to $500 for “ordinary” data breach losses including bank fees, communication expenses, credit-related costs, and up to four hours of lost time at a rate of $15 per hour. Class members who experienced any “extraordinary” data breach expenses, including unreimbursed monetary losses caused by identity theft or fraud, are eligible to receive an additional $3,500 in reimbursement if they have supporting documentation.

The case is Charlie, et al. v. Rehoboth McKinley Christian Health Care Services, Case No. 21-652 SCY/KK, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico.

For more details and deadlines, see the official settlement website at RehobothDataSettlement.com. 

DataBreaches notes one of the terms of the settlement:

New Practices: RMCHCS has implemented security-related improvements related to its cybersecurity since the Data Breach. RMCHCS agrees to provide Plaintiffs with information
regarding these improved security-related measures implemented by RMCHCS no later than 60 days after execution of the Settlement Agreement.

DataBreaches hopes these will not be just “we retrained employees to be careful” kinds of improvements.

According to HHS’s public breach tool, its investigation of the incident remains open.


Related:

  • KT Chief to Resign After Cybersecurity Breach Resolution
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • John Bolton Indictment Provides Interesting Details About Hack of His AOL Account and Extortion Attempt
  • A business's cyber insurance policy included ransom coverage, but when they needed it, the insurer refused to pay. Why?
Category: Breach IncidentsCommentaries and AnalysesHealth DataMalware

Post navigation

← Activision did not notify employees of data breach for months
Thoughts on Dubin v. United States and the Aggravated Identity Theft Statute →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.