DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Ca: SLGA business partners should have figured out on their own that their data may have been stolen: minister

Posted on April 7, 2022 by Dissent

Geoff Leo reports on what sounds like an utterly unsatisfactory response by the government to questions as to why it didn’t directly notify those affected of a breach:

The minister responsible for the Saskatchewan Liquor and Gaming Authority (SLGA) says the Crown corporation didn’t directly notify its business partners that their data may have been stolen in a hack because those companies should have figured it out on their own.

According to a Dec 28 news release, SLGA’s computer systems were the target of a “cyber security incident” on Christmas Day. It said that at that time, “SLGA does not have any evidence that the security of any customer, employee or other personal data has been misused.” The organization repeated that line in communications with business partners.

Three weeks after the hack, the organization alerted employees that their data may have been stolen and offered them credit monitoring services.

At that time, it gave no such notification to SLGA’s suppliers, vendors or licensees.

So the government told them they had no evidence, but then only told some of those affected when the risk level changed after they did find evidence. They didn’t directly update/notify the others?

[…]

In an email, SLGA told CBC it is required by law to notify people whose data may have been unlawfully accessed and may be misused. The organization said rather than notify the potential victims directly, it decided to use the “indirect notification” approach, posting an update on its website.

SLGA says in a written statement on its website that Saskatchewan’s privacy commissioner has given the thumbs up to this indirect approach in cases “where the privacy breach is potentially very large or you may not be able to identify the affected individuals.”

Ah, the old “indirect notification approach,” otherwise known as “We can’t be expected to act responsibly after we were breached, so you’re kind of on your own. 🙁 ”

Unbelievable.  At the very least, the government should have plastered big press releases in national media and popular provincial media.

Read more at CBC.

h/t, Brett Callow, who has his own thoughts on the matter.

 


Related:

  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Toys “R” Us Canada customers notified of breach of personal information
  • Data breach in 42 Latvian municipalities: DVI imposes 300,000 euro fine on ZZ Dats
  • Kaufman County's data breach was their second one in three weeks
  • Hacking Formula 1: Accessing Max Verstappen's passport and PII through FIA bugs
Category: Government SectorHack

Post navigation

← SuperCare Health notifies 318,379 patients of July breach
Pentester for FIN7 sentenced for scheme that compromised tens of millions of debit and credit cards →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says
  • The Case for Making EdTech Companies Liable Under FERPA
  • NHS providers reviewing stolen Synnovis data published by cyber criminals

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.