DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Developing: AlphV allegedly scammed Change Healthcare and its own affiliate (1)

Posted on March 4, 2024August 2, 2025 by Dissent

Developing:  Someone claiming to be an “affiliate plus” for AlphV claims they were responsible for the Change Healthcare attack but that AlphV stole the payment Change Healthcare had made and suspended the affiliate’s account.

The affiliate’s claims appeared on Ramp Forum and have been circulating since then. The post can be seen below, via @vx-underground:

 

Post by “notchy” on Ramp Forum accused ALPHV of cheating them out of their share of a $22 million ransom payment by Change Healthcare.

So Change Healthcare reportedly paid $22 million to get a decryptor and to get their data deleted but a copy of the data is still in the hands of the affiliate who did not receive their share of the payment. The affiliate provided the exact wallet address in their post.

DataBreaches was able to reach a now-former admin of AlphV. They informed DataBreaches that they had nothing to do with the Change Healthcare attack or aftermath, and they have now left AlphV after they, too, were locked out of some things.  They confirmed that the admin(s) had stolen the affiliate’s funds and also confirmed that Change Healthcare had been given a decryptor after they paid.  The problem now for Change, the former admin said, is the data.

A re-branding is pending, the individual said, adding that “lots” of listings on the current AlphV site are fakes. When asked which are fakes, they named Dragos, Tripalti, and “some insurance companies.”

According to this source, we should expect to see more victims re-extorted.

After AlphV was taken down in December, it tried to recruit new affiliates by offering them “Affiliate Plus” status — i.e., a bigger share of any payments.

“I guess LB was the safer option after all,” they added.

DataBreaches reached out to Change Healthcare to ask if they would confirm or deny the affiliate’s allegations about their payment and the decryptor, but they would only respond, “Right now I can share that we are focused on the investigation.”

This post was updated at 9:50 pm to add Change Healthcare’s response to inquiries.


Related:

  • KT Chief to Resign After Cybersecurity Breach Resolution
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • A business's cyber insurance policy included ransom coverage, but when they needed it, the insurer refused to pay. Why?
  • Before Their Telegram Channel Was Banned Again, ScatteredLAPSUS$Hunters Dropped Files Doxing Government Employees (2)
Category: Breach IncidentsHealth DataMalwareU.S.

Post navigation

← Three recent breach disclosures remind us how seldom timely breach notification is enforced under HITECH
Fraudster’s fake data breach claims should remind media to be careful what we report →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.