DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Ankle + Foot Center of Tampa Bay breach affecting 156,000 included Social Security Numbers as well as PHI

Posted on February 3, 2011 by Dissent

Now that I have additional information on a hacking incident involving the protected health information (PHI) of 156,000 patients of the Ankle + Foot Center of Tampa Bay, it is clear that this breach belongs on this site. I had previously noted it on PHIprivacy.net on January 29 after it appeared on HHS’s breach tool. At the time, however, I found no statement on the center’s web site or additional details.

A copy of the center’s notification letter to patients dated January 7th subsequently became available on their web site. It reads, in part:

On or about November 10, 2010, the Company learned that outside third party attempts had been made against the Practice Management System that stores your personal patient data, including your health information.

The information accessed by this unauthorized third party included information such as patient names, social security numbers, date of birth, home addressees, account numbers, and healthcare services and related diagnostic code(s) (“Personal Information”).  The Company is conducting an internal investigation of the circumstances surrounding the unauthorized third party’s actions and appropriate authorities have been notified.

And in a “personal statement” also posted to their site, they write:

I understand your concern, Ankle and Foot center has no evidence that any of their patients lives have been adversely affected, nor do we have any evidence to date that their data has been compromised. This is strictly a preventative measure on the part of  Ankle and Foot Centers to notify all of their patients that there may have been a breach and to closely monitor their own personal records for any unauthorized changes. Ankle and Foot Centers has elected to voluntarily notify the proper authorities at the Health and Human Services and is working closely with the FBI to ensure that our patients data still is, and always will remain confidential. If you have any further questions please call our 877 number or visit our website. This is an ongoing investigation and this is what we know

The personal statement seems to be more confusing or self-serving than anything. Having told patients that their information was accessed, they are then also told that “there may have been a breach” and there is no evidence to date that their data “has been compromised.”   What will most members of the public do with such information in light of that statement?  Is it overly reassuring and would they have been better off being told, “Look, you could be at risk of identity theft or fraudulent use of your data, so we strongly recommend that you….”

I really wish Congress would enact legislation that specifies important required elements of a breach disclosure/notice and that prohibits certain kinds of misleading statements.

Carousel Image © Judydean | Dreamstime.com

Category: Breach IncidentsHackHealth DataOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← UK: Patients are "misled" over confidentiality of health e-records, say Oxford researchers
NV: Conspirator in case involving University Medical Center patient data pleads guilty →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • After $1 Million Ransom Demand, Virgin Islands Lottery Restores Operations Without Paying Hackers
  • Junior Defence Contractor Arrested For Leaking Indian Naval Secrets To Suspected Pakistani Spies
  • Mysterious leaker GangExposed outs Conti kingpins in massive ransomware data dump
  • Resource: HoganLovells Asia-Pacific Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Guide 2025
  • Class action settlement following ransomware attack will cost Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center about $52 million
  • Comstar LLC agrees to corrective action plan and fine to settle HHS OCR charges
  • Australian ransomware victims now must tell the government if they pay up
  • U.S. Sanctions Cloud Provider ‘Funnull’ as Top Source of ‘Pig Butchering’ Scams
  • Victoria’s Secret takes down website after security incident
  • U.S. Government Employee Arrested for Attempting to Provide Classified Information to Foreign Government

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Fears Grow Over ICE’s Reach Into Schools
  • Resource: HoganLovells Asia-Pacific Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Guide 2025
  • She Got an Abortion. So A Texas Cop Used 83,000 Cameras to Track Her Down.
  • Why AI May Be Listening In on Your Next Doctor’s Appointment
  • Watch out for activist judges trying to deprive us of our rights to safe reproductive healthcare
  • Nebraska Bans Minor Social Media Accounts Without Parental Consent
  • Trump Taps Palantir to Compile Data on Americans

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.