DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

The definitions of “recently” and “discovered” leave a lot to be desired

Posted on January 15, 2022 by Dissent

In March, 2021, Family Health Services MN d/b/a Entira Family Clinics notified the Maryland Attorney General’s Office that they had been impacted by the Netgain ransomware attack that affected more than one dozen covered entities and more than 1 million patients.

Entira’s external counsel’s letter of March 1, 2021, identified the dates upon which Netgain had first notified Entira of the incident (December 20, 2020) and then notified them that some of Entira’s data had been removed from the network by the threat actors (January 4, 2021). By the March 1 letter, Entira had already investigated to determine who had data potentially compromised, and what kind of information.

So why, on January 13, 2022, does Entira send a letter to patients in Maine that begins:

Entira Family Clinics is a family medicine practice with locations across Minnesota. We recently discovered that a data security incident on Netgain’s environment may have resulted in the unintentional exposure of your personal information. This letter contains additional information about the incident, our response to the incident, and steps you can take to protect yourself. Please be assured that Entira takes the protection and proper use of personal information very seriously, and we sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

They “recently discovered?”  Recently?  Ten months after Maryland was notified, Maine residents first get notified?

This notification letter does not tell the recipient when the incident occurred, when Entira was first notified about it, and when Entira first discovered any PHI was involved.  Why did Maryland residents get such detailed information but not Maine residents?

Now I grant you that there were apparently (only) nine Maine residents out of a total of 199,628 patients who needed to be notified about this breach, but this is still infuriating.

And if you are surprised to learn that almost 200,000 patients were impacted by this breach, rest assured that you didn’t miss anything. Entira reported this breach to HHS in March, 2021 as impacting 1975 patients and there has been no update to that listing on HHS’s public breach tool.

Updated January 15: It appears Caring Communities Shared Services has sent  the same letter to an unspecified number of people. Why it took them until now to notify people is unknown to this site and no listing could be found on HHS’s public breach tool.

 

 

 

Category: Breach Incidents

Post navigation

← Guilford Technical Community College notifies 65,646 affected by ransomware incident in 2020
Polish DPA imposes a fine on Warsaw University of Technology for not complying with its obligation →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Former JBLM soldier pleads guilty to attempting to share military secrets with China
  • No, the 16 billion credentials leak is not a new data breach — a wake-up call about fake news
  • Tonga’s health system hit by cyberattack
  • Russia Expert Falls Prey to Elite Hackers Disguised as US Officials
  • Proposed class action settlement in In re Netgain Technology litigation
  • Qilin Offers “Call a lawyer” Button For Affiliates Attempting To Extort Ransoms From Victims Who Won’t Pay
  • Ireland’s Data Protection Commission publishes 2024 Annual Report
  • The headlines suggested Freedman Healthcare suffered a ransomware attack that affected patient data. The reality was quite different.
  • Runsafe report: Medical device cyberattacks threaten patient care, strain budgets, top concern for healthcare sector
  • Ryuk ransomware’s initial access expert extradited to the U.S. from Ukraine

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • UK Passes Data Use and Access Regulation Bill
  • Officials defend Liberal bill that would force hospitals, banks, hotels to hand over data
  • US Judge Invalidates Biden Rule Protecting Privacy for Abortions
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data
  • DOJ Seeks More Time on Tower Dumps
  • Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.