DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

The definitions of “recently” and “discovered” leave a lot to be desired

Posted on January 15, 2022 by Dissent

In March, 2021, Family Health Services MN d/b/a Entira Family Clinics notified the Maryland Attorney General’s Office that they had been impacted by the Netgain ransomware attack that affected more than one dozen covered entities and more than 1 million patients.

Entira’s external counsel’s letter of March 1, 2021, identified the dates upon which Netgain had first notified Entira of the incident (December 20, 2020) and then notified them that some of Entira’s data had been removed from the network by the threat actors (January 4, 2021). By the March 1 letter, Entira had already investigated to determine who had data potentially compromised, and what kind of information.

So why, on January 13, 2022, does Entira send a letter to patients in Maine that begins:

Entira Family Clinics is a family medicine practice with locations across Minnesota. We recently discovered that a data security incident on Netgain’s environment may have resulted in the unintentional exposure of your personal information. This letter contains additional information about the incident, our response to the incident, and steps you can take to protect yourself. Please be assured that Entira takes the protection and proper use of personal information very seriously, and we sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

They “recently discovered?”  Recently?  Ten months after Maryland was notified, Maine residents first get notified?

This notification letter does not tell the recipient when the incident occurred, when Entira was first notified about it, and when Entira first discovered any PHI was involved.  Why did Maryland residents get such detailed information but not Maine residents?

Now I grant you that there were apparently (only) nine Maine residents out of a total of 199,628 patients who needed to be notified about this breach, but this is still infuriating.

And if you are surprised to learn that almost 200,000 patients were impacted by this breach, rest assured that you didn’t miss anything. Entira reported this breach to HHS in March, 2021 as impacting 1975 patients and there has been no update to that listing on HHS’s public breach tool.

Updated January 15: It appears Caring Communities Shared Services has sent  the same letter to an unspecified number of people. Why it took them until now to notify people is unknown to this site and no listing could be found on HHS’s public breach tool.

 

 

 


Related:

  • KT Chief to Resign After Cybersecurity Breach Resolution
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • A business's cyber insurance policy included ransom coverage, but when they needed it, the insurer refused to pay. Why?
  • Before Their Telegram Channel Was Banned Again, ScatteredLAPSUS$Hunters Dropped Files Doxing Government Employees (2)
  • Attorney General James Secures $14.2 Million from Car Insurance Companies Over Data Breaches
  • Months After Being Notified, a Software Vendor is Still Exposing Confidential and Sealed Court Records
Category: Breach Incidents

Post navigation

← Guilford Technical Community College notifies 65,646 affected by ransomware incident in 2020
Polish DPA imposes a fine on Warsaw University of Technology for not complying with its obligation →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.